Revoked by A.1155(32)
RESOLUTION
MEPC.321(74)/Corr.1
(adopted on 17 May
2019)
corrected by MEPC 74/18/Add.1/Corr.1
11 September 2019
2019
GUIDELINES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI CHAPTER 3
THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION COMMITTEE,
RECALLING Article 38(a) of the Convention on the International
Maritime Organization concerning the functions of the Marine Environment
Protection Committee conferred upon it by the international conventions for the
prevention and control of marine pollution,
RECALLING ALSO that, at its fifty-eighth session, the Committee
adopted, by resolution MEPC.176(58),
a revised MARPOL Annex VI which significantly strengthens the controls on
emissions,
NOTING that articles 5 and 6 of the MARPOL Convention and
regulations 10 and 11 of MARPOL Annex VI provide control procedures to be
followed by a Party to the 1997 Protocol with regard to foreign ships visiting
its ports,
RECALLING that, at its fifty-ninth session, the Committee adopted,
by resolution MEPC.181(59),
2009 Guidelines for port State control under the revised MARPOL Annex VI,
NOTING that the revised MARPOL Annex VI entered into force on 1
July 2010 and since then there have been several amendments to the provisions,
RECOGNIZING the need to revise the 2009 Guidelines for port
State control under the revised MARPOL Annex VI, in accordance with
provisions of the MARPOL Annex VI, as amended,
HAVING CONSIDERED, at is seventy-fourth session, draft 2019
Guidelines for port State control under MARPOL Annex VI prepared by the
Sub-Committee on Pollution Prevention and Response, at its sixth session,
following a review by the Sub-Committee on Implementation of IMO Instruments,
at its fifth session,
1 ADOPTS the 2019
Guidelines for port State control under MARPOL Annex VI Chapter 3 (2019 PSC
Guidelines), as set out in the annex to the present resolution;
2 INVITES
Governments, when exercising port State control under MARPOL Annex VI, to apply
the 2019 PSC Guidelines from 1 January 2020;
3 INVITES
Governments, when exercising port State control under MARPOL Annex VI, to apply
the provisions of MARPOL Annex VI concerning the prohibition on the carriage of
non-compliant fuel oil for combustion purposes for propulsion or operation on
board a ship from 1 March 2020;
4 INVITES
Governments, when exercising port State control under MARPOL Annex VI, to apply
the provisions of MARPOL Annex VI concerning electronic record books from 1
October 2020;
5 AGREES to keep
these Guidelines under review in the light of experience gained with their
application;
6 REVOKES the 2009
Guidelines for port State control under the revised MARPOL Annex VI adopted
by resolution MEPC.181(59),
from 1 January 2020.
ANNEX
2019 GUIDELINES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI
CHAPTER 3
Chapter 1 GENERAL
1.1 This document is
intended to provide basic guidance on the conduct of port State control
inspections for compliance with MARPOL Annex VI (hereinafter referred to as
"the Annex") and afford consistency in the conduct of these
inspections, the recognition of deficiencies and the application of control
procedures.
1.2 Chapters 1 (General),
4 (Contravention and detention), 5 (Reporting requirements) and 6 (Review
procedures) of the Procedures for Port State Control, as adopted by the
Organization, as may be amended, also applies to these Guidelines.
Chapter 2 INSPECTIONS
OF SHIPS REQUIRED TO CARRY THE IAPP CERTIFICATE
2.1 Initial inspections
2.1.1 The PSCO should
ascertain the date of ship construction and the date of installation of
equipment on board which are subject to the provisions of the Annex, in order
to confirm which regulations of the Annex are applicable.
2.1.2 On boarding and
introduction to the master or responsible ship's officer, the port State
control officer (PSCO) should examine the following documents, where
applicable:
.1 the International
Air Pollution Prevention Certificate (IAPP Certificate) (regulation VI/6),
including its Supplement;
.2 the Engine
International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate (EIAPP Certificate)
(paragraph 2.2 of the NOX Technical Code) including its Supplement,
for each applicable marine diesel engine;
.3 the Technical File
(paragraph 2.3.4 of the NOX Technical Code) for each applicable
marine diesel engine;
.4 depending on the
method used for demonstrating NOX compliance for each applicable
marine diesel engine:
.1 the Record Book of
Engine Parameters for each marine diesel engine (paragraph 6.2.2.7 of the NOX
Technical Code) demonstrating compliance with regulation VI/13 by means of the
marine diesel engine parameter check method; or
.2 documentation
relating to the simplified measurement method; or
.3 documentation
related to the direct measurement and monitoring method;
.5 for a ship to which
regulation VI/13.5.1 applies for a particular NOX Tier III emission
control area and that has one or more installed marine diesel engines certified
to both Tier II and Tier III or which has one or more marine diesel engines
certified to Tier II only1 that there are the
required log book and the recordings for the tier and on/off status of those
marine diesel engines while the ship is within an applicable NOX
Tier III emission control area;
________________
1 Unified Interpretation to
regulation 13.5.3 set out in MEPC.1/Circ.795/Rev.4.
.6 the Approved Method
File (regulation VI/13.7);
.7 the written
procedures covering fuel oil change over operations (in a working language or
languages understood by the crew) where separate fuel oils are used in order to
achieve compliance (regulation VI/14.6);
.8 the approved
documentation relating to exceptions and/or exemptions granted under regulation
VI/3;
.9 the approved
documentation (SECC where issued, ETM, OMM, SECP) and relating to any installed
Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (EGCS) or equivalent means, to reduce SOX
emissions (regulation VI/4);
.10 that the required
EGCS monitoring records have been retained and show compliance. Additionally,
that the EGCS Record Book including nitrate discharge data and performance
records,2 or approved alternative,
has been duly maintained;
________________
2 In assessing the Emission Ratio and discharge water records the
PSCO should be mindful that such factors as transient engine operation or
analyser performance outputs may result in isolated "spikes" in the
recorded output which, while these
measurements in themselves
may be above
the required Emission
Ratio or discharge water limit
values, do not indicate that overall the EGCS was not being operated and
controlled as required and hence should not be taken as evidence of non-compliance
with the requirements.
.11 the bunker delivery
notes (BDNs) and representative samples or records thereof (regulation VI/18);
.12 the copy of the type
approval certificate of applicable shipboard incinerator (resolutions MEPC.76(40) or MEPC.244(66));
.13 the Ozone Depleting
Substances Record Book (regulation VI/12.6);
.14 the VOC Management
Plan (regulation VI/15.6);
.15 any notification to
the ship's flag Administration issued by the master or officer in charge of the
bunker operation together with any available commercial documentation relevant
to non-compliant bunker delivery, regulation VI/18.2; and
.16 if the ship has not
been able to obtain compliant fuel oil, the notification to the ships flag
Administration and the competent authority of the relevant port of destination
as set out in the appendix.
The Record Books referenced in sub-paragraphs .1, .5, .10 and 13
above may be presented in an electronic format. A declaration from the
Administration should be viewed in order to accept this Electronic Record Book.
If a declaration cannot be provided, a hard copy Record Book will need to be
presented for examination.
2.1.3 As a preliminary
check, the IAPP Certificate's validity should be confirmed by verifying that
the Certificate is properly completed and signed and that required surveys have
been performed.
2.1.4 Through examining
the Supplement to the IAPP Certificate, the PSCO may establish how the ship is
equipped for the prevention of air pollution.
2.1.5 In the case where
the bunker delivery note or the representative sample as required by regulation
VI/18 presented to the ship are not in compliance with the relevant
requirements (the BDN is set out in appendix V of MARPOL Annex VI), the master
or officer in charge of the bunker operation may have documented that through a
Notification to the ships flag Administration with copies to the port
authority under whose jurisdiction the ship did not receive the required
documentation pursuant to the bunkering operation and to the bunker deliverer.
2.1.6 In addition, if the
BDN shows compliant fuel, but the master has independent test results of the
fuel oil sample taken by the ship during the bunkering which indicates
non-compliance, the master may have documented that through a Notification to
the ship's flag Administration with copies to the competent authority of the
relevant port of destination, the Administration under whose jurisdiction the
bunker deliverer is located and to the bunker deliverer.
2.1.7 In all cases, a copy
may be retained on board the ship, together with any available commercial
documentation, for the subsequent scrutiny of port State control.
2.2 Initial inspection on ships equipped with
equivalent means of SOX compliance.
2.2.1 On ships equipped with equivalent means of
compliance, the PSCO will look at:
.1 evidence that the
ship has received an appropriate approval for any installed equivalent means
(approved, under trial or being commissioned);
.2 evidence that the
ship is using an equivalent means, as identified on the Supplement of the IAPP
certificate, for fuel oil combustion units on board or that compliant fuel oil
is used in equipment not so covered; and
.3 BDNs on board3
which indicate that the fuel oil is intended to be used in combination with an
equivalent means of SOX compliance or the ship is subject to a
relevant exemption to conduct trials for SOX emission reduction and
control technology research.
_________________
3 Resolution MEPC.305(73) Prohibition
on the carriage of non-compliant fuel oil for combustion purposes for
propulsion or operation on board a ship is not applicable to fuel oil
carried as cargo or for ships fitted with an approved equivalent means of
compliance.
2.2.2 In the case where an
EGCS is not in compliance with the relevant requirements for other than
transitory periods and isolated spikes in the recorded output, the master or
officer in charge may have documented that through a Notification to the ship's
flag Administration with copies to the competent authority of the relevant port
of destination, and present those corrective actions taken in order to rectify
the situation in accordance with the guidance given in the EGCS Technical
Manual. If a malfunction occurs in the instrumentation for the monitoring of
emission to air or the monitoring of washwater discharge to sea, the ship may
have alternative documentation demonstrating compliance.4
_________________
4 MEPC.1/Circ.883
on Guidance on indication of ongoing compliance in the case of the failure
of a single monitoring instrument, and recommended actions to take if the
Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (EGCS) fails to meet the provisions of the 2015
EGCS Guidelines (resolution MEPC.259(68)),
ships should have documented notification of system non-compliance to relevant
authorities as in paragraph 2.2.2.
2.3 Initial inspection
within an ECA
2.3.1 When a ship is
inspected in a port in an ECA designated for SOX emission control,
the PSCO should look at:
.1 evidence of fuel oil
delivered to and used on board with a sulphur content of not more than 0.10%
m/m through the BDNs and appropriate onboard records including records of
bunkering operations as set out in the Oil Record Book Part 1 (regulation
VI/18.5 and VI/14.4); and
.2 for those ships
using separate fuel oils for compliance with regulation VI/14, evidence of a
written procedure (in a working language or languages understood by the crew)
and records of changeover to fuel oil with a sulphur content of not more than
0.10% m/m before entering the ECA such that compliant fuel was being used while
sailing in the entire ECA as required in regulation VI/14.6.
2.3.2 When a ship to which
regulation VI/13.5.1 applies for a particular NOX Tier III emission
control area is inspected in a port in that area, the PSCO should look at:
.1 the records in
respect of the tier and on/off status, together with any changes to that status
while within that NOX Tier III emission control area, which are to
be logged as required by regulation VI/13.5.3 in respect of an installed marine
diesel engine certified to both Tier II and Tier III or which is certified to
Tier II only5; and
_________________
5 Unified Interpretation
to regulation 13.5.3 set out in MEPC.1/Circ.795/Rev.4.
.2 the status of an
installed marine diesel engine which is certified to both Tier II and Tier III
showing that that engine was operating in its Tier III condition on entry into
that NOX Tier III emission control area and that status was
maintained at all times while that marine diesel engine was in operation within
that area; or
.3 the records related
to the conditions associated with an exemption granted under regulation
VI/13.5.4 have been logged as required by that exemption and that the terms and
duration of that exemption have been complied with as required.
2.4 Initial inspection
outside an ECA or first port after transiting an ECA
2.4.1 When a ship is
inspected in a port outside ECA the PSCO will look to the same documentation
and evidence as during inspections in ports inside the ECA. The PSCO should in
particular look at:
.1 evidence that the
sulphur content of the fuel oil is in accordance with regulation VI/14.16
through the BDNs and appropriate onboard records including records of bunkering
operations as set out in the Oil Record Book Part 1 (regulation VI/18.5 and
VI/14.4); and
_________________
6 Resolution MEPC.305(73) Prohibition
on the carriage of non-compliant fuel oil for combustion purposes for
propulsion or operation on board a ship is not applicable to fuel oil
carried as cargo or for ships fitted with an approved equivalent means of
compliance.
.2 evidence of a written procedure (in a working language or
languages understood by the crew) and records of changeover from fuel oil with
a sulphur content of not more than 0.10% m/m after leaving the ECA such that
compliant fuel was being used while sailing in the in the entire ECA.
2.4.2 When a ship to which
regulation VI/13.5.1 applies for a particular NOX Tier III emission
control area is inspected in a port outside that area, the PSCO should look at
the records required by 2.3.2.1 and 2.3.2.2 or 2.3.2.3 to ensure that the
relevant requirements were complied with for the whole period of time the ship
was operating in that area.
2.5 Outcome of initial
inspection
2.5.1 If the certificates
and documents are valid and appropriate and, after an inspection of the ship to
check that the overall condition of the ship meets generally accepted
international rules and standards, the PSCO's general impressions and
observations on board confirm a good standard of maintenance, the inspection
should be considered satisfactorily concluded.
2.5.2 If, however, the
PSCO's general impressions or observations on board give clear grounds (see
paragraph 2.5.3) for believing that the condition of the ship or its equipment
do not correspond substantially with the particulars of the certificates or the
documents, the PSCO should proceed to a more detailed inspection.
2.5.3 "Clear grounds" to conduct a more
detailed inspection include:
.1 evidence that
certificates required by the Annex are missing or clearly invalid;
.2 evidence that
documents required by the Annex are missing or clearly invalid;
.3 the absence or
malfunctioning of equipment or arrangements specified in the certificates or
documents;
.4 the presence of
equipment or arrangements not specified in the certificates or documents;
.5 evidence from the
PSCO's general impressions or observations that serious deficiencies exist in
the equipment or arrangements specified in the certificates or documents;
.6 information or
evidence that the master or crew are not familiar with essential shipboard
operations relating to the prevention of air pollution, or that such operations
have not been carried out;
.7 evidence of inconsistency
between information in the bunker delivery note and paragraph 2.3 of the
Supplement to the IAPP certificate;
.8 evidence that an
equivalent means has not been used as required; or
.9 evidence, for
example by fuel calculators, that the quantity of bunkered compliant fuel oil
is inconsistent with the ship's voyage plan; and
.10 receipt of a report
or complaint containing information that the ship appears to be non-compliant
including but not limited to information from remote sensing surveillance of SOX
emissions or portable fuel oil sulphur content measurement devices indicating
that a ship appears to use non-compliant fuel while in operation/underway;
.11 evidence that the
tier and/or on/off status of applicable installed marine diesel engines has not
been maintained correctly or as required;
.12 receipt of a report
or complaint containing information that one or more of the installed marine
diesel engines has not been operated in accordance with the provisions of the
respective Technical File or the requirements relevant to a particular NOX
Tier III emission control area; and
.13 receipt of a report
or complaint containing information that the conditions attached to an
exemption granted under regulation VI/13.5.4 have not been complied with.
2.6 More detailed
inspections
2.6.1 The PSCO should verify that:
.1 there are
effectively implemented maintenance procedures for the equipment containing
ozone-depleting substances; and
.2 there are no
deliberate emissions of ozone-depleting substances.
2.6.2 In order to verify
that each installed marine diesel engine with a power output of more than 130
kW is approved by the Administration in accordance with the NOX
Technical Code and maintained appropriately, the PSCO should pay particular
attention to the following:
.1 examine such marine
diesel engines to be consistent with the EIAPP Certificate and its Supplement,
Technical File and, if applicable, Record Book of Engine Parameters or Onboard
Monitoring Manual and related data;
.2 examine marine
diesel engines specified in the Technical Files to verify that no unapproved
modifications, which may affect NOX emission, have been made to the
marine diesel engines;
.3 in the case of an
installed marine diesel engine certified to Tier III that the required records,
if applicable, in accordance with regulation VI/13.5.3 or in the Technical
File, including those required by 2.3.6 of the NOX Technical Code,
have been maintained as necessary and that the marine diesel engine, including
any NOX control device and associated ancillary systems and
equipment, including, where fitted, bypass arrangements, is maintained in
accordance with the associated Technical File and is in good order;
.4 if applicable,
examine whether the conditions attached to an exemption granted under
regulation VI/13.5.4 have been complied with as required;
.5 examine marine
diesel engines with a power output of more than 5,000 kW and a per cylinder
displacement at or above 90 litres installed on a ship constructed on or after
1 January 1990 but prior to 1 January 2000 to verify that they are certified,
if so required, in accordance with regulation VI/13.7;
.6 in the case of ships
constructed before 1 January 2000, verify that any marine diesel engine which
has been subject to a major conversion, as defined in regulation VI/13, has
been approved by the Administration; and
.7 emergency marine
diesel engines intended to be used solely in case of emergency are still in use
for this purpose.
2.6.3 The PSCO should
check and verify whether fuel oil complies with the provisions of regulation
VI/14 taking into account appendix VI7 of
this Annex.
____________________
7 Amendments to MARPOL VI,
Appendix VI, Verification procedures for a MARPOL Annex VI fuel oil sample
(regulation 18.8.2 or regulation 14.8), expected to be adopted in Spring
2020 and set out in annex 13 to document MEPC 74/18/Add.1.
2.6.4 The PSCO should pay
attention to the record required in regulation VI/14.6 in order to identify the
sulphur content of fuel oil used by the ship depending on the area of trade, or
that other equivalent approved means have been applied as required, the fuel
oil consumed in and outside ECA, and that there is enough fuel in compliance
with regulation VI/14 to reach the next port destination.
2.6.5 Where EGCS is used,
the PSCO should check that it has been installed and operated, together with
its monitoring systems, in accordance with the associated approved
documentation according to the survey procedures as established in the OMM.
2.6.6 If the ship is
equipped with an EGCS as an equivalent means of SOX compliance, the
PSCO should verify that the system is properly functioning, is in operation,
there are continuous-monitoring systems with tamper-proof data recording and
processing devices,8 if applicable and the records demonstrate the necessary
compliance when set against the limits given in the approved documentation and
applies to relevant fuel combustion units on board. Checking can include but is
not limited to: emissions ratio, pH, PAH, turbidity readings as limit values
given in ETM-A or ETM-B and operation parameters as listed in the system
documentation.
____________________
8 Equivalent emission values
for emission abatement methods are 4.3 and 21.7 SO2 (ppm)/CO2
(% v/v) for marine fuels with a sulphur content of 0.10 and 0.50 (% m/m)
respectively.
2.6.7 If the ship is a
tanker, as defined in regulation VI/2.21, the PSCO should verify that the
vapour collection system approved by the Administration, taking into account MSC/Circ.585,
is installed, if required under regulation VI/15.
2.6.8 If the ship is a
tanker carrying crude oil, the PSCO should verify that there is on board an
approved VOC Management Plan.
2.6.9 The PSCO should verify that prohibited
materials are not incinerated.
2.6.10 The PSCO should
verify that shipboard incineration of sewage sludge or sludge oil in boilers or
marine power plants is not undertaken while the ship is inside ports, harbours
or estuaries (regulation VI/16.4).
2.6.11 The PSCO should
verify that the shipboard incinerator, if required by regulation VI/16.6.1, is
approved by the Administration. For these units, it should be verified that the
incinerator is properly maintained, therefore the PSCO should examine whether:
.1 the shipboard
incinerator is consistent with the certificate of shipboard incinerator;
.2 the operational
manual, in order to operate the shipboard incinerator within the limits provided
in appendix IV to the Annex, is provided; and
.3 the combustion
chamber flue gas outlet temperature is monitored at all times the unit is in
operation (regulation VI/16.9).
2.6.12 If there are clear
grounds as defined in paragraph 2.5.3, the PSCO may examine operational
procedures by confirming that:
.1 the master or crew
are familiar with the procedures to prevent emissions of ozone-depleting
substances;
.2 the master or crew
are familiar with the proper operation and maintenance of marine diesel
engines, in accordance with their Technical Files or Approved Method file, as
applicable, and with due regard for Emission Control Areas for NOX
control;
.3 the master or crew
are familiar with fuel oil bunkering procedures in connection to the respective
bunker delivery notes and onboard records including the Oil Record Book Part 1
(regulation VI/18.5 and VI/14.4) and retained samples as required by regulation
VI/18;
.4 the master or crew
are familiar with the correct operation of an EGCS or other equivalent means on
board together with any applicable monitoring and recording, and record keeping
requirements;
.5 the master or crew
are familiar and have undertaken the necessary fuel oil changeover procedures,
or equivalent, associated with demonstrating compliance within an Emission
Control Area;
.6 the master or crew
are familiar with the garbage screening procedure to ensure that prohibited
garbage is not incinerated;
.7 the master or crew
are familiar with the operation of the shipboard incinerator, as required by
regulation VI/16.6, within the limits provided in appendix IV to the Annex, in
accordance with its operational manual;
.8 the master or crew
are familiar with the regulation of emissions of VOCs, when the ship is in
ports or terminals under the jurisdiction of a Party to the 1997 Protocol to
MARPOL 73/78 in which VOCs emissions are to be regulated, and are familiar with
the proper operation of a vapour collection system approved by the
Administration (in case the ship is a tanker as defined in regulation VI/2.21);
and
.9 the master or crew
are familiar with the application of the VOC Management Plan, if applicable.
2.7 Detainable
deficiencies
2.7.1 In exercising
his/her functions, the PSCO should use professional judgment to determine
whether to detain the ship until any noted deficiencies are corrected or to
allow it to sail with certain deficiencies which do not pose an unreasonable
threat of harm under the scope of the Annex provided they will be timely
addressed. In doing this, the PSCO should be guided by the principle that the
requirements contained in the Annex, with respect to the construction,
equipment and operation of the ship, are essential for the protection of the
marine environment, the navigational safety or the human health and that
departure from these requirements could constitute an unreasonable threat of
harm to the mentioned protection aspects and should be avoided.
2.7.2 In order to assist
the PSCO in the use of these Guidelines, there follows a list of deficiencies,
which are considered, taking into account the provisions of regulation VI/3, to
be of such a serious nature that they may warrant the detention of the ship
involved:
.1 absence of valid
IAPP Certificate, EIAPP Certificates or Technical Files, if applicable;