RESOLUTION MEPC.356(78)
(adopted on 10 June 2022)
2022 GUIDELINES FOR BRIEF SAMPLING OF ANTI-FOULING SYSTEMS ON
SHIPS
THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION COMMITTEE,
RECALLING Article 38(a) of the Convention on the International
Maritime Organization concerning the functions of the Marine Environment
Protection Committee conferred upon it by the international conventions for the
prevention and control of marine pollution,
RECALLING ALSO that the International Conference on the Control of
Harmful Anti-fouling Systems for Ships, 2001, held in October 2001, adopted the
International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on
Ships, 2001 (the AFS Convention) together with four Conference resolutions,
NOTING that article 11(1) of the AFS Convention prescribes that
ships to which this Convention applies may, in any port, shipyard, or offshore
terminal of a Party, be inspected by officers authorized by that Party for the
purpose of determining whether the ship is in compliance with this Convention,
that such inspection may include brief sampling of the ship's anti-fouling
system, and that article 11(1) of the AFS Convention refers to the guidelines
to be developed by the Organization,
NOTING ALSO resolution MEPC.104(49) by which the Committee adopted
the Guidelines for brief sampling of anti-fouling systems on ships,
RECALLING FURTHER that at its seventy-sixth session it adopted
amendments to the AFS Convention to introduce controls on cybutryne through
resolution MEPC.331(76),
RECOGNIZING the need for a consequential revision of the
guidelines associated with the AFS Convention due to the aforementioned
amendments,
NOTING FURTHER that through resolutions MEPC.358(78) and MEPC.357(78) the Organization adopted 2022
Guidelines for survey and certification of anti-fouling systems on ships
and 2022 Guidelines for inspection of anti-fouling systems on ships, respectively,
HAVING CONSIDERED a revised text of the Guidelines for brief
sampling of anti-fouling systems on ships prepared by the Sub-Committee on
Pollution Prevention and Response at its ninth session,
1 ADOPTS the 2022
Guidelines for brief sampling of anti-fouling systems on ships (2022
Guidelines), the text of which is set out in the annex to this resolution;
2 INVITES
Governments to apply the 2022 Guidelines as soon as possible, or when the
Convention becomes applicable to them;
3 RECOMMENDS that
the Guidelines be reviewed on a regular basis;
4 REVOKES resolution
MEPC.104(49).
2022 GUIDELINES FOR BRIEF SAMPLING OF ANTI-FOULING SYSTEMS ON
SHIPS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. General
Purpose
Structure of these
Guidelines
2. Definitions
3. Personnel safety when sampling
Health
Safety
4. Sampling and analysis Sampling methods
Technical aspects
Sampling strategy and number
of samples
Analysis
5. Thresholds and tolerance limits
Thresholds
Tolerance range
6. Definition of compliance
7. Documentation and recording of information
APPENDIX
- Possible methods for brief sampling and analysis of anti-fouling systems on
ships - organotin and/or cybutryne
Method
1
Appendix
to method 1 Record sheet for the brief
sampling procedure for compliance with the Convention in terms of the presence
of organotin and/or cybutryne acting as a biocide in anti-fouling systems on
ship hulls
Method
2
Appendix
to method 2 Record sheet for the
sampling and analysis of anti-fouling systems on ship hulls - organotin
compounds and/or cybutryne
1 General
Purpose
1.1 Article 11 of the
International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on
Ships, 2001, hereinafter referred to as "the Convention", and
resolution MEPC.358(78)
on 2022 Guidelines for survey and certification of anti-fouling systems on
ships, refer to sampling as a method of verification of compliance of a
ship's anti-fouling system with the Convention for inspection and survey.
1.2 The Guidelines
for brief sampling of anti-fouling systems on ships, hereinafter referred
to as "the Guidelines", provide procedures for sampling to support
the effectiveness of survey and inspection to ensure that a ship's anti-fouling
system complies with the Convention and thus assists:
.1 Administrations and recognized
organizations (ROs) in the uniform application of the provisions of the
Convention;
.2 port State control officers with guidance
on methods and handling of brief sampling in accordance with article 11(1)(b)
of the Convention; and
.3 companies, shipbuilders, manufacturers of
anti-fouling systems, as well as any other interested parties, in understanding
the process of sampling as required in terms of the Convention.
1.3 However,
inspections or surveys do not necessarily always need to include sampling of
the anti-fouling system.
1.4 These Guidelines
apply to surveys and inspections of ships subject to the Convention.
1.5 The sole purpose of
the sampling activities described in the Guidelines is to verify compliance
with the provisions of the Convention. Consequently, such activities do not
relate to any aspect not regulated by the Convention (even if such aspects
relate to the performance of an anti-fouling system on the hull of a ship,
including the quality of workmanship).
Structure of these Guidelines
1.6 These Guidelines
contain:
.1 a main body covering aspects of general
nature common to "sampling" procedures related to the regulation of
anti-fouling systems controlled by the Convention; and
.2 appendices describing the unique
procedures associated with the sampling and analysis of anti-fouling systems
controlled by the Convention. These appendices only serve as examples of
sampling and analytical methods, and other sampling methods not described in an
appendix may be used subject to the satisfaction of the Administration or the
port State, as appropriate.
1.7 For reasons
including the event of further anti-fouling systems becoming controlled under
the Convention, or in the light of new experience acquired, these Guidelines
may need to be reviewed or amended in the future.
2 Definitions
For the purposes of these Guidelines:
2.1 "Administration"
means the Government of the State under whose authority the ship is operating.
With respect to a ship entitled to fly a flag of a State, the Administration is
the Government of that State. With respect to fixed or floating platforms
engaged in exploration and exploitation of the seabed and subsoil thereof
adjacent to the coast over which the coastal State exercises sovereign rights
for the purposes of exploration and exploitation of their natural resources,
the Administration is the Government of the coastal State concerned.
2.2 "Anti-fouling
system" means a coating, paint, surface treatment, surface or device that
is used on a ship in order to control or prevent attachment of unwanted
organisms.
2.3 "Threshold
value" means the concentration limit of the chemical under investigation
below which compliance with the relevant provisions of the Convention may be
assumed.
2.4 "Company"
means the owner of the ship or any other organization or person such as the
manager or the bareboat charterer, who has assumed the responsibility for the
operation of the ship from the owner of the ship and who, on assuming such
responsibility, has agreed to take over all duties and responsibilities imposed
by the International Safety Management (ISM) Code.
2.5 "Length" means
the length as defined in the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966, as
modified by the Protocol of 1988 relating thereto, or any successor Convention.
2.6 "Tolerance
range" means the numerical range added to the threshold value indicating the
range where detected concentrations above the threshold value are acceptable
due to recognized analytical inaccuracy and thus do not compromise the
assumption of compliance.
3 Personnel safety
when sampling
Health
3.1 Persons carrying
out sampling should be aware that solvents or other materials used for sampling
may be harmful. Wet paint which is sampled may also be harmful. In these cases,
the material safety data sheet (MSDS) for the solvent or paint should be read
and appropriate precautions should be taken. This will normally include the
wearing of long sleeve solvent resistant gloves of suitable impervious
material, e.g. nitrile rubber.
3.2 Quantities of dry
anti-fouling paint removed during sampling from ships' hulls will normally be
too small to cause significant health effects.
Safety
3.3 Access to ships to
carry out sampling safely may be difficult. If a ship is moored alongside,
persons carrying out sampling must ensure they have safe access to reach the
hull from, for example, platforms, crane baskets, cherry pickers or gangways.
They must ensure that they are protected by railings or a climbing harness or
take other precautions so that they cannot fall into the water between the quay
and the ship. If in doubt a lifejacket, and possibly a safety line, should be
worn when sampling.
3.4 Access to ships in
dry dock should be made by secure means. Scaffolding should be securely
constructed and cherry pickers or dock-arms should be properly constructed and
maintained if they are to be used to gain access. There should be a system to
record the presence of the inspector in the dock area, and he or she should
preferably be accompanied. Safety harnesses should be worn in cherry-picker
baskets, if used.
4 Sampling and
analysis
Sampling methods
4.1 During sampling,
care should be taken not to affect the integrity or operation of the
anti-fouling system.
4.2 Sampling where the
anti-fouling coating is visibly damaged1 or on block mark areas on
the flat bottom of the ship (where the intact anti-fouling system is not
applied) should be avoided. Sampling adjacent to or below areas where the
anti-fouling system is damaged should also be avoided. When a sample point on
the hull has been selected, any fouling present should be removed with water
and a soft sponge/cloth before taking a specimen of the anti-fouling system (to
avoid contamination of the sample). Where possible, if carried out in dry dock,
sampling should be carried out after the hull has been water-washed.
________________
1 During in-service
periods, anti-fouling coatings on ships' hulls often become damaged. The extent
of damage varies between ships and damaged areas can be visually recognized.
Typically, damage can be restricted to localized areas, e.g. anchor chain
damage (bow region), fender damage (vertical sides of hull), ʺrust through
areasʺ (underlying rust causing coating failure), or in some cases can be
in smaller areas scattered over larger areas of the hull (usually older ships
where over-coating of the original system has taken place many times).
4.3 The materials
required for brief sampling methodologies should ideally be inexpensive, widely
available and therefore readily accessible, irrespective of sampling conditions
and/or location.
4.4 The sampling
procedure should ideally be easily and reliably undertaken. Persons conducting
sampling should receive appropriate training in sampling methods.
Technical aspects
4.5 The sampling method
should take into account the type of anti-fouling system used on the ship
(taking into account that different parts of the hull may be treated with
different anti-fouling systems).
4.6 Sampling and
analysis of the ship's anti-fouling system could be related to only one or to
all of the substances listed in Annex 1 of the AFS Convention. The following
cases could be considered:
Case
A. Analysis of organotin only
Case
B. Analysis of cybutryne only
Case
C. Simplified approach to detect organotin and cybutryne
4.7 Depending on the
case, the number of samples, analysis, and definition of compliance will
differ.
4.8 Specimens of paint
for analysis during survey and certification can be taken either as wet paint2
from product containers, or dry paint film sampled from the hull.
_______________
2 In order to prevent
contamination, wet paint samples should be taken from a newly opened container.
Paint should be stirred to ensure even consistency before sampling and all
equipment used should be cleaned prior to use. Liquid paint samples should be
stored in appropriate sealed packaging which will not react with or contaminate
the sample. In the case of multi-component coatings (where on-site mixing of
several components is required prior to application), samples of each component
should be taken and the required mixing ratio recorded. When a sample of wet
paint is taken from a container, details of the paint should be recorded, e.g.
details required for the IAFS Certificate along with a batch number for the
product.
Sampling strategy and number of samples
4.9 The sampling
strategy is dependent on the precision of the sampling method, the analytical
requirements, costs, and required time and the purpose of the sampling. The
number of paint specimens taken of each sample should allow for a retention
quantity for back-up/storage in the event of a dispute. For dry samples,
triplicate specimens of paint at each sampling point should be taken in close
proximity to each other on the hull (e.g. within 10 cm of each other).
4.10 In cases where it is
recognized that more than one type of anti-fouling system is present on the
hull, where access can be gained, samples should be taken from each type of
system:
.1 For survey purposes or for more thorough
inspections pursuant to article 11(2) of the Convention, in order to verify the
compliance of an anti-fouling system, the number of sample points should
reflect representative areas of the ship's hull.
.2 For inspection purposes pursuant to
article 11(1) of the Convention sample points on the hull should be selected
covering representative areas where the anti-fouling system is intact.
Depending on the size of the ship and accessibility to the hull, at least four
sample points should be equally spaced down the length of the hull. If sampling
is undertaken in dry dock, flat bottom areas of the hull should be sampled in
addition to vertical sides as different anti-fouling systems can be present on
these different areas.
4.11 The distribution of
any remaining anti-fouling paint on the hull surface may not be uniform.
Therefore, it is important that the sampling is representative of the hull
status; see Guidelines for survey and certification of anti-fouling systems
on ships, appendix I, paragraph 2).
Analysis
4.12 The analysis of the
anti-fouling system should ideally involve minimal analytical effort and
economic cost.
4.13 The analysis should
be conducted by a recognized laboratory meeting the ISO 17025 standard or
another appropriate facility at the discretion of the Administration or the port
State.
4.14 The analytical
process should be expeditious, such that results are rapidly communicated to
the officers authorized to enforce the Convention.
4.15 The analysis should
produce unambiguous results expressed in units consistent with the Convention
and its associated guidelines. For example, for organotin, results should be
expressed as: mg tin (Sn) per kg of dry paint, and, for cybutryne: mg of
cybutryne per kg of dry paint.
NOTE: Compound-specific sampling and analytical methodologies are
described in the appendices to these Guidelines.
5 Thresholds and
tolerance limits
Thresholds
5.1 The analysis should
be quantitative to the point of being able to accurately verify the threshold
limits within the given tolerance.
5.2 In cases where
compliance with acceptable limits, or lack thereof, is unclear, additional
sampling or other methodologies for sampling should be considered.
Tolerance range
5.3 Statistical
reliability for each (compound-specific) brief sampling procedure should be
documented. The analysis should be quantitative to the point of being able to
accurately verify the threshold limits within the given tolerance. On the basis
of these data a compound-specific tolerance range should be derived and stated
in the method description. In general, the tolerance range should not be higher
than the standard deviation under typical conditions for testing and should
under no circumstances go beyond 30%.
6 Definition of
compliance
6.1 Compliance with
Annex 1 to the Convention is assumed if the anti-fouling system
contains:
.1 organotin at a level which does not
provide a biocidal effect. In practice organotin compounds should not be
present above 2,500 mg organotin (measured as Sn) per kg of dry paint; and
.2 cybutryne at a level which does not
provide a biocidal effect. It should not be present above 1,000 mg of cybutryne
per kg of dry paint.
6.2 Compliance is
largely dependent on the results of sampling and subsequent analysis. As every
method of sampling and analysis has its specific accuracy, a compound-specific
tolerance level may be applied in borderline cases with concentrations very
close to the threshold level.
6.3 In general,
compliance is assumed when the samples yield results below the threshold value.
7 Documentation and
recording of information
7.1 The results of the
sampling procedure should be fully documented on a method-specific record
sheet. Examples are provided in the appendices to these Guidelines.
7.2 Such record sheets
should be completed by the sampler and should be submitted to the competent
authority of the port State or Administration.
APPENDIX
POSSIBLE METHODS FOR BRIEF SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF ANTI-FOULING
SYSTEMS ON SHIPS
- ORGANOTIN AND/OR CYBUTRYNE -
METHOD 1
1 Purpose of this
method concerning brief sampling and analysis of anti-fouling systems
1.1 This method has
been developed in order to describe a rapid methodology appropriate for the
identification of anti-fouling systems on ship hulls containing organotin
compounds and/or cybutryne acting as biocide. This method has been designed
such that sealers should not be affected, and any underlying anti-fouling agent
(or primer) is not taken up in the sampling procedure. The method is not recommended
for silicon-based anti-fouling systems.
1.2 The method for
organotin compounds (Case A under paragraph 4.6 of the Guidelines) is based on
a two-step analysis. The first step detects total tin as an indicator for
organotin; the second step, detecting specific organotin compounds, is only
necessary in the case of the first step proving positive.
1.3 The method for
cybutryne (Case B under paragraph 4.6 of the Guidelines) is based on a one-step
analysis.
1.4 The simplified
approach (Case C under paragraph 4.6 of the Guidelines) to detect organotin
compounds and cybutryne is based on a one-step analysis.
2 Sampling device
and materials
2.1 The sampling device
is constructed in a way that only the upper layer of paint is removed, thereby
it should leave any underlying paint (sealer, primer, etc.) intact. This result
is achieved through the use of a moving disk (eccentric rotation), which is
covered by an abrasive material like quartz or glass fibre fabric. This
abrasive material has to be suitable for its use as a supporting material for
the removed paint.
2.2 The device fulfils
the following requirements:
.1 the device has to work independently from
any stationary power supply. The device may be driven by an electrical motor (battery-driven)
or may be mechanically driven by a clockwork-like spring, provided it is able
to sustain the movement over the required time period;
.2 the applied force has to be constant
during the operation, and the area for paint removal has to be defined;
.3 the abrasive material has to be inert
against chemical solvents and acids and must not contain more than trace
amounts of tin or tin compounds and/or cybutryne; and
.4 the amount of paint removed after a
regular operation of the device has to be shown to exceed 20 mg per sample.
2.3 The device as
described in the following section has been shown to be suitable for the brief
sampling procedure. Any other device may be used however, provided such a
device has proven to meet all the above-mentioned requirements.
2.4 The sampling device
described here consists of a polyethylene disk, on which fibre glass fabric can
be mounted by the use of an O-ring. The disk is moved on an eccentrically
rotating axis.
3 Sampling procedure
3.1 The sampling
procedure should be performed in the following manner:
.1 control samples should be taken through
the entire sampling and analytical process to account for possible
contamination;
.2 the mass of the fibreglass pads is weighed
with a precision of at least 1 mg. The weight should be documented for each
sample;
.3 the fabric should be moistened thoroughly
with isopropanol (0.7 mL per sample) immediately before sampling;
.4 when a sample point on the hull has been
selected, any fouling present should be removed with water and a soft
sponge/cloth before taking a specimen of the anti-fouling system (to avoid
contamination of the sample). Where possible, if carried out in dry dock,
sampling should be carried out after the hull has been water-washed;
.5 the sampling device is then held against
the surface to be sampled for a period of five seconds, prior to the sampling
device being switched on;
.6 the sampling device is switched on,
thereby removing paint by the circular motion of the fibre glass fabric against
the surface of the ship;
.7 the sampling device should be applied to
the surface of the hull for a suitable period of time, such that at least 20 mg
of paint is taken up by the pad. As a general rule, if the pad colour after
sampling matches the colour of the hull coating a sufficient sample has been
taken;
.8 the specimens should be taken as close to
each other as possible, but without overlap;
.9 upon completion of the sampling, the
fibreglass fabric pads should be left to dry and re-weighed;
.10 the number of samples will differ
depending on the substances targeted as listed in Annex 1 of the AFS
Convention.
Case A. Analysis of
organotin only, every sample should be taken in triplicate.
Specimen 'A' - for Step 1
Specimen 'B' - for Step 2
Specimen 'X' - for
storage/back-up
Case B. Analysis of
cybutryne only, every sample should be taken in duplicate.
Specimen 'C' - for a
one-step analysis
Specimen 'X' - for
storage/back-up
Case C. Simplified approach
to detect organotin and cybutryne, every sample should be taken in duplicate.
Specimen 'C' - for a
one-step analysis
Specimen 'X' - for
storage/back-up
3.2 Samples should be
stored in appropriate sealed packaging which will not react with or contaminate
the sample.
Diagram A: Schematic cross section of the sampling device
The indicated points A and B are to be pressed against the
surface. The polyethylene disk, covered with the glass fibre fabric, is moved
with an amplitude of 2 r (r = 1.0 cm) on the surface.
Specific data:
Force applied on the paint surface: |
25 N (Newton) |
Effective diameter of the disk: |
5 cm |
Frequency of rotation: |
6 rotations/s |
Solvent used: |
isopropanol (0.8 mL per sample). |
4 Sampling strategy
4.1 Sampling should be
conducted in accordance with paragraph 4 of the Guidelines.
4.2 For inspection
purposes in most cases accessibility to all parts of the hull will not be
given. A minimum number of eight independent samples should be taken from
different accessible parts of the hull.
5 Analytical
procedure
5.1 The analytical
procedure will differ depending on the substances targeted as listed in Annex 1
of the AFS Convention.
Case A. Analysis of organotin only
5.2 The two components
comprising the analytical procedure are illustrated in the flow diagram B. The
two components, or steps, are as follows:
.1 (Step 1) - An analysis of Specimen 'A' for
the presence of total tin; and
.2 (Step 2) - A more cost- and time-consuming
analysis of Specimen 'B', that is applied only when Step 1 produces positive
results. This test involves organotin analysis by gas chromatography/mass
spectrophotometry (GC/MS) after derivatization and provides specific data on
the respective organotin species.
Step 1: Investigation of total tin content in Specimen 'A'
Analysis of Specimen 'A'
5.3 Specimen
'A' is analysed for mass of total tin per kilogram of dry paint (or mass of tin
per sample) by applying inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry (ICP/MS),
once the material had been solubilized by digestion using aqua regia. It should
be noted that any other scientifically recognized procedure for tin analysis
(such as AAS, XRF and ICP-OES) is acceptable.
Step 2: Characterization of organotin in Specimen 'B'
Analysis of Specimen 'B'
5.4 Should
Specimen 'A' produce positive results, organotin compounds should be identified
and quantified in Specimen 'B'. Specimen 'B' may be analysed using the
following procedure:
.1 solvent extraction of Specimen 'B' as
supported by sonication in an ultrasonic bath;
.2 derivatization with ethylmagnesium
bromide;
.3 clean-up of the extract;
.4 analysis using high resolution gas
chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS); and
.5 quantifications using tripropyltin as a
standard.
5.5 Any equally
reliable method for the chemical identification and quantification of organotin
compounds is acceptable.
Case B. Analysis of cybutryne only
5.6 A one-step analysis
of 'Specimen C' for determining the amount of cybutryne, using gas chromatography/mass
spectrophotometry (GC/MS).
One-step analysis: Characterization of cybutryne in Specimen 'C'
Analysis of Specimen 'C'
5.7 Specimen 'C' should
be analysed using the following procedure:
.1 sample extraction using ethyl acetate with
added internal standard (ametryn) using an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes;
.2 ventrifugation of the samples at 600 rcf
for 5 minutes;
.3 analysis of the supernatant using high
resolution capillary GC/MS, with the MS operating in SIM mode;
.4 quantification using reference cybutryne
solutions and an internal standard normalization procedure; and
.5 modified GC/MS methods resulting in an
expanded measurement uncertainty (k=2; 95% confidence) of 25% are
acceptable.
5.8 Other methods for
the chemical identification and quantification of cybutryne, if proven equally
reliable, could be accepted by the Administration or the port State.
Case C. simplified approach to detect organotin and cybutryne
5.9 A one-step analysis
of Specimen 'C' for determining the amount of organotin and cybutryne using gas
chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS).
One-step analysis: Characterization of organotin and cybutryne in
Specimen 'C'
.1 sample extraction using toluene with added
internal standard (ametryn) using an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes;
.2 derivatization with ethylmagnesium
bromide;
.3 clean-up of the extract;
.4 centrifugation of the samples at 600 rcf
for 5 minutes;
.5 analysis of the supernatant using high
resolution capillary GC/MS, with the MS operating in SIM mode;
.6 cybutryne quantification using reference
cybutryne solutions and an internal standard normalization procedure. Organotin
quantification using tripropyltin as the internal standard; and
.7 modified GC/MS methods resulting in an
expanded measurement uncertainty (k=2; 95% confidence) of 25% are
acceptable.
5.10 Other methods for
the chemical identification and quantification of organotin and cybutryne, if
proven equally reliable, could be accepted by the Administration or the port
State.
6 Threshold and
tolerance range
6.1 The threshold value
for organotin compounds for the brief sampling method as described here
is:
"2,500 mg tin (Sn) per kg of dry paint."
6.2 The threshold value
for cybutryne for the brief sampling method as described here is:
ʺ1,000 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint.ʺ
Tolerance range
6.3 The tolerance range
is 500 mg Sn / kg of dry paint (20%) in addition to the threshold value.
6.4 The tolerance range
is 250 mg cybutryne / kg of dry paint (25%) in addition to the threshold value.
Organotin-containing compounds acting as biocides or catalysts
6.5 As stated in
appendix I of resolution MEPC.358(78),
for the purposes of defining compliance with Annex 1 to the Convention, it
should be noted that small quantities of organotin compounds, acting as
chemical catalysts (such as mono- and di-substituted organotin compounds), are
allowed, provided they are not acting as a biocide.
6.6 Inorganic
impurities in the constituents of the paints should be considered.
6.7 At present neither
organotin catalysts nor inorganic impurities are found at concentrations which
will be close to the threshold level (2,500 mg Sn/kg of dry paint) or higher.
However, organotin-containing compounds, when present in paint in order to act
as a biocide, were found in concentrations up to 50,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint.
Thus, the discrimination between anti-fouling systems containing organotin
compounds acting as a biocide and anti-fouling systems not containing these
compounds or not containing these compounds at concentrations where they act as
a biocide is reliably possible.
7 Definition of
compliance
7.1 The analytical
verification of the compliance will differ depending on the substances targeted
as listed in Annex 1 of the AFS Convention.
Case A. Analysis of organotin only Two-step procedure
7.2
The analytical
verification of the compliance with the Convention for organotin compounds is performed in a
two-step procedure according to the flow-diagram (diagram B).
Diagram B: Flow diagram illustrating the two-step analysis
procedure for organotin compounds
Compliance with the criteria at the 'Step 1-level'
7.3 Compliance with the
Convention is assumed when the results from the specimens 'A', analysed in step
1, meet the following:
.1 no more than 25% of the total number of
samples yield results above 2,500 milligrams total tin per kilogram dry paint
(2,500 mg Sn/kg of dry paint); and
.2 no sample of the total number of at least
eight samples shows a concentration of total tin higher than the sum of
threshold value plus the tolerance range, i.e. no sample must exceed the
concentration 3,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint.
7.4 If
the results in specimen 'A' indicate that no organotin acting as biocide is
present, then performing step 2 is not necessary.
Non-compliance with the criteria at the 'Step 1-level'
7.5
A positive result
(non-compliance) is indicated if the provisions of paragraph 7.3 are not met.
7.6 A positive result
at step 1 (specimen 'A') would indicate that step 2 should be undertaken, and
those samples labelled specimen 'B' should be analysed in order to determine
and characterize the organotin present (see diagram B).
Compliance with the criteria at the 'Step 2-level'
7.7 Compliance with the
Convention is assumed when the results from the specimens 'B', analysed in step
2, meet the following requirements at the same time:
.1 no more than 25% of the total number of
samples yield results above 2,500 milligrams total tin per kilogram dry paint
(2,500 mg Sn/kg of dry paint); and
.2 no sample of the total number of at least
eight samples shows a concentration of total tin higher than the sum of
threshold value plus the tolerance range, i.e. no sample must exceed the
concentration 3,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint.
Non-compliance at 'Step 2-level'
7.8 A positive result
in step 2 indicates non-compliance if the provisions of paragraph 7.7 are not
met. Such results should be interpreted to mean that organotin compounds are
present in the anti-fouling system at a level at which it would act as a
biocide.
Case B. Analysis of cybutryne only
7.9 Compliance with the
Convention is assumed when the results from specimen 'C', analysed in a
one-step analysis for cybutryne, meet the following requirement:
.1 The average value of the total number of
specimens shows a concentration below the threshold plus the tolerance range,
i.e. 1,250 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint.
Non-compliance at the one-step analysis for cybutryne
7.10 An average value of
the total number of specimens showing a concentration above the threshold plus
the tolerance range, i.e. 1,250 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint, indicates
non-compliance.
Case C. Simplified approach to detect organotin and cybutryne
7.11 Compliance with the
Convention is assumed when the results from specimen 'C', analysed in a
one-step analysis for organotin and cybutryne, meet the two conditions below:
.1 for organotin, the average value of the
total number of specimens shows a concentration below the threshold plus the
tolerance range, i.e. 3,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint; and
.2 for cybutryne, the average value of the
total number of specimens shows a concentration below the threshold plus the
tolerance range, i.e. 1,250 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint.
Non-compliance at the one-step analysis for organotin and
cybutryne
7.12 If one of the
conditions set out in paragraph 7.11 above is not met, this indicates
non-compliance. Such results should be interpreted to mean that cybutryne or
organotin is present in the anti-fouling system at a level at which it would
act as a biocide.
APPENDIX TO METHOD 1
RECORD SHEET FOR THE BRIEF SAMPLING PROCEDURE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE CONVENTION IN TERMS OF THE PRESENCE OF ORGANOTIN AND/OR CYBUTRYNE ACTING
AS A BIOCIDE IN ANTI-FOULING SYSTEMS ON SHIP HULLS
RECORD
SHEET: GUIDELINES
FOR BRIEF SAMPLING OF ANTI-FOULING
SYSTEMS ON SHIPS - ORGANOTIN AND CYBUTRYNE |
RECORD NUMBER: |
|
SECTION
1: Administration |
||
1.
Country |
2.
Name of port |
3. Date |
4.
Reason for sampling ☐ Port State control |
☐ Survey &
certification |
☐
Other flag State compliance inspection |
5.
Company details: |
|
6. Inspecting official's details |
1.
Name of ship: 2.
Distinctive number or letters:
3.
Port of registry 4.
Gross tonnage: 5.
IMO number: |
|
1. Name: 2. Comments: |
SECTION
2: Sampling |
||
1.
Time sampling procedure initiated: |
||
2.
Description of location from where samples were taken (frame number and
distance from boot topping, refer to paragraph 3.2): |
||
3.
Number of samples taken (three or two specimens per sample): |
||
4.
Photographs taken of the sample point prior to sampling? |
||
☐ Yes ☐ No |
||
5.
Time sampling procedure completed: |
||
6.
Additional comments concerning sampling procedure: |
SECTION
3: Analysis and results |
||||||||
Case
A. Analysis of organotin only |
||||||||
1.
Step 1 total tin analysis: Company
name: Analyst
responsible: Date:
|
||||||||
2.
Specimen 'A' results: |
Total
number of specimens 'A' analysed: |
|||||||
No. |
mg Sn / kg |
No. |
mg Sn / kg |
No. |
mg Sn / kg |
No. |
mg Sn / kg |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
9 |
|
13 |
|
|
2 |
|
6 |
|
10 |
|
14 |
|
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
11 |
|
15 |
|
|
4 |
|
8 |
|
12 |
|
16 |
|
|
Number
of specimens exceeding 2,500 mg/kg: |
||||||||
1
or more specimens exceeding 3,000 mg/kg: ☐ Yes ☐ No |
||||||||
Conclusion:
Step 2
required ☐ Compliance,
further analysis unnecessary ☐ |
||||||||
3.
Additional comments concerning analysis of results from Specimens 'A': |
||||||||
4.
Organotin analysis undertaken by: Company
name: Analyst
responsible: Date: |
||||||||
5.
Specimen 'B' results: Total
number of specimens 'B' analysed: |
||||||||
No. |
mg Sn / kg |
No. |
mg Sn / kg |
No. |
mg Sn / kg |
No. |
mg Sn / kg |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
9 |
|
13 |
|
|
2 |
|
6 |
|
10 |
|
14 |
|
|
3 |
|
7 |
|
11 |
|
15 |
|
|
4 |
|
8 |
|
12 |
|
16 |
|
|
Number
of specimens exceeding 2,500 mg/kg: |
||||||||
1
or more specimens exceeding 3,000 mg/kg: ☐ Yes
☐ No
|
||||||||
Conclusion:
Non-compliance
☐ Compliance,
further analysis unnecessary: ☐ |
||||||||
6.
Additional comments concerning analysis of results from Specimens 'B': |
||||||||
Case
B. Analysis of cybutryne only |
||
1.
A one-step analysis using gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS) Company
name: Analyst
responsible: Date:
|
||
2.
Specimen 'C' results: |
|
|
Total number of specimens 'C' analysed by GC-MS: |
|
|
Average concentration of cybutryne (mg of cybutryne per kg of
dry paint): |
|
|
3.
Conclusions: |
||
The average
concentration of cybutryne exceeds the threshold of 1,250 mg of cybutryne per
kg of dry paint |
☐ Yes ☐ No |
|
4.
Additional comments concerning analysis of results from Specimens 'C': |
||
Case
C. Simplified approach to detect organotin and cybutryne |
||
1.
A one-step analysis using gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS) Company
name: Analyst
responsible: Date:
|
||
2.
Specimen 'C' results: |
|
|
Total number of specimens 'C' analysed by GC-MS: |
|
|
Average concentration of organotin (mg Sn per kg of dry paint): |
|
|
Average concentration of cybutryne (mg of cybutryne per kg of
dry paint): |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Conclusions: |
||
The
average concentration of organotin exceeds the threshold of 3,000 mg Sn/kg of
dry paint |
☐ Yes
☐ No
|
|
The
average concentration of cybutryne exceeds the threshold of 1,250 mg of
cybutryne/kg of dry paint |
☐ Yes ☐ No |
|
4.
Additional comments concerning analysis of results from Specimens 'C': |
||
SECTION
4: Final conclusion
|
Summarized
conclusion: Compliance with
AFS Convention assumed ☐ Non-compliance
with AFS Convention assumed ☐ |
THIS
IS TO CERTIFY that this Record is correct in all respects. Issued
at |
_____________________________________________________________ (Place of issue of Record) |
________________________________________________________________________
(Date of issue)
(Printed name and signature of authorized official issuing the Record)
(Seal or stamp of the authority/organization) |
METHOD 2
1 Purpose of this
method
1.1 This method
provides sampling and analysis procedures to identify the presence of organotin
compounds and/or cybutryne in the anti-fouling systems on ships. The method is
designed such that the sampling and the first stage analysis could be carried
out by ship surveyors or port State control officers (PSCOs) on the
survey/inspection site, e.g. at a dry dock.
1.2 The method for
organotin compounds is based on a two-stage analysis (case A under paragraph
4.6 of the Guidelines). The first stage detects total tin as an indicator for
the presence of organotin and the second stage is necessary only in the case
that the first stage analysis providing a positive result to detect specific
organotin compounds.
1.3 The method for
cybutryne analysis (case B under paragraph 4.6 of the Guidelines) is based on a
one-step analysis based on the gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry
analytical method (GC/MS).
1.4 A simplified
approach to detect organotin and cybutryne (case C under paragraph 4.6 of the
Guidelines) is based on a one-step analysis using the gas chromatography/mass
spectrophotometry analytical method (GC/MS).
2 Sampling
2.1 The sampling is
carried out by using abrasive paper rubbing on the surface of the anti-fouling
system. This results in collection of paint fragments of the anti-fouling
system from a thin area, less than several micrometres in depth from the
surface, which do not affect the coatings lying underneath such as sealers.
2.2 Abrasive paper is
pasted on a disc of approximately 10 mm in diameter. Rubbing the surface of the
anti-fouling system with the disc collects several milligrams of the sample on
to the abrasive paper.
2.3 The sampling device
consists of an electric motor, two (or three) rotating rods on each of which a
disc is attached, and a battery for electric power supply. The discs are
pressed on to the surface of the ship's hull by spring coils. The discs rotate
counter-clockwise while the rods turn clockwise around the centre of the
device. A schematic diagram is given in figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of sampling device
2.4 A sampling point is
selected such that the anti-fouling system is intact over an area of
approximately 50 cm x 50 cm or more.
2.5 Depending on the
substances targeted as listed in Annex 1 of the AFS Convention:
Case
A. For the analysis of organotin only, at
each sampling point, three sets of sampling, or more if necessary, should be
carried out to obtain at least six specimens.
Case
B. For the analysis of cybutryne only, at
each sampling point, three sets of sampling, or more if necessary, should be
carried out to obtain at least six specimens.
Case
C. For the analysis of organotin and
cybutryne, at each sampling point, three sets of sampling, or more if
necessary, should be carried out to obtain at least six specimens.