Circular letter
MSC/Circ.1130
GUIDANCE TO MASTERS, COMPANIES AND DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS ON THE REQUIREMENTS
RELATING TO THE SUBMISSION OF SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION PRIOR TO THE ENTRY
OF A SHIP INTO PORT
(adopted on 10 December 2004)
1.
The Maritime Safety Committee (the Committee), at its seventy-ninth session (1
to 10 December 2004), has developed, based on the requirements of SOLAS
regulation XI-2/9.2.1 and taking into account the guidance provided in part В
of the ISPS Code and resolution MSC.159(78), a Guidance to masters, Companies
and duly authorized officers on the requirements relating to the submission of
security-related information prior to the entry of a ship into port (the
Guidance) which is set out in the Annex. The Committee has developed the
Guidance in an effort to prevent the proliferation of different demands for
security-related information, which are neither conducive to the enhancement of
maritime security nor promote the facilitation of maritime traffic.
2
The work of the Committee was based on the work undertaken by the Facilitation
Committee, at its thirty-first session (19 to 23 July 2004), where the
proliferation of different demands for security-related information was first
raised.
3.
The attached Guidance cites the salient provisions of SOLAS regulation XI-2/9
and the guidance provided in paragraphs B/4.37 to B/4.40 of the ISPS Code,
contains some practical advice and sets out in the appendix thereto a standard
data set of security-related information a ship might be expected to submit
prior to entry into port if requested to do so.
4.
The Committee invites Member Governments to bring the attached Guidance to the
attention of masters, Companies and, if appropriate to the attention of port
facility security officers. In addition, the Committee urges SOLAS Contracting
Governments to bring the attached Guidance to the attention of those officers
they have authorized or they may authorize to carry out control and compliance
measures pursuant to the provisions of SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.
5.
The Committee also invites Member Governments, international organizations and
non-governmental organizations with consultative status to bring to the
attention of the Committee the results of the experience they have gained from
the use of the Guidance and in particular from the use of the standard data set
of security-related information.
Annex.
GUIDANCE TO MASTERS, COMPANIES AND DULY AUTHORIZED,OFFICERS ON THE REQUIREMENTS
RELATING TO THE SUBMISSION OF SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION PRIOR TO THE ENSTRY
OF A SHIP INTO PORT
1.
The purpose of this Guidance is to provide a standard data set of
security-related information a ship might expect to provide prior to entry into
port. In addition, this Guidance, in an effort to clarify the requirements of
SOLAS regulation XI-2/9 on Control and compliance measures, and taking into,
account the guidance provided in part В of the ISPS Code, cites the salient
provisions of SOLAS regulation XI-2/9 and of. paragraphs B/4.37 to B/4.40 of
the ISPS Code.
Control and
compliance measures
2.
SOLAS regulation XI-2/9 describes the control and compliance measures
applicable to ships to which SOLAS chapter XI-2, applies. It is divided into
three distinct sections: control of ships already in port; control of ships
intending to enter a port of another SOLAS Contracting Government (Contracting
Government); and additional provisions applicable to both situations.
3.
SOLAS regulation XI-2/9 should always be read in association with the guidance
provided in paragraphs B/4.29 to B/4.40 of the ISPS Code and resolution
MSC.159(78) on Interim guidance on control and compliance measures to enhance
maritime security.
The requirement to
submit information prior to entry into port and the consequences of failing to
do so
4.
SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.2 requires every ship to which SOLAS chapter XI-2
applies intending to enter the port of an-other Contracting Government to
provide the information de-scribed in SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1 on the
request of the officers duly authorized by that Government. The master may
decline to provide such information on the understanding that failure to do so
may result in denial of entry into port.
5.
Paragraph B/4.40 of the ISPS Code states that SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.5
allows the master of a ship, upon being in-formed that the coastal or port
State will implement control measures under SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2, to
withdraw the intention for the ship to enter port. If the master withdraws that
intention, SOLAS regulation XI-2/9 no longer applies, and any other steps that
are taken must be based on, and consistent with, international law.
The standard data set
of security-related information
6.
The appendix to this Guidance provides the standard data set of
security-related information a ship might expect to submit prior to entry into
port.
7.
The development of the standard data set of security-related information should
not be construed as preventing any Contracting Government from seeking the
submission information supplementary to that contained in the standard data
set, or requiring additional information as a condition for entry into a port
located within its territory.
8.
In addition, the development of the standard data set of security-related
information should not be construed as preventing any Contracting Government or
any duly authorized officer from seeking, at any stage during the stay of the
ship within port, documentary or other evidence to validate or verify the
in-formation submitted or from taking any control measures or steps against the
ship pursuant to the provision of SOLAS regulation XI-2/9 during the exercise
of any control and compliance measures. In this respect it is noted that SOLAS
regulation XI-2/9.2.1 provides that, if requested by the Contracting
Government, the ship or the Company shall provide confirmation, acceptable to
that Contracting Government, of the information required.
Who should submit the
information, to whom, when and how
9.
The information described in SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1 should be submitted by
the master of the ship. However, the Ship Security Officer and the Company
Security Officer may submit the information on behalf of the master. In
addition, the Agent of the ship at the port where the ship seeks entry may,
under the expressed authority of the master, also submit the in-formation on
behalf of the master.
10.
Contracting Governments are expected to advise Companies and ships to whom,
including the relevant contact details, the security-related information is to
be sent.
11.
As indicated above, SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.2 requires every ship to which
SOLAS chapter XI-2 applies intending to enter the port of another Contracting
Government to provide the information described in SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1
on the request of the officers duly authorized by that Government. However it
is understood that a number of Contracting Governments have established
national requirements which require every ship intending to enter their ports
to provide such information. In such cases duly authorized officers do not make
individual requests to ships for the submission of information. Those
Contracting Governments who have established such practices are expected to
advise Companies and ships on the standing requirements in place.
12.
Contracting Governments should consider establishing either central or regional
points of contact, or other means of providing up to date information on the
submission of security-related information. The existence of such contact
points should be published.
13.
Unless a Contracting Government has established a different time period prior
to the arrival of the ship in port for the submission of the required
information the recommended de-fault minimum period for the submission of such
information is not to be less than 24 hours.
14.
The information described in SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1 and the standard data
set of the security-related information set in the appendix may be submitted in
an electronic format. In such a case it is understood that the submission will
not bear the signature of the person submitting the information unless a secure
form of electronic signatures is available.
Other
security-related information which may be required
15.
SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1.6 allows Contracting Governments to seek the
submission of other practical security related information (but not details of
the ship security plan), taking into account the guidance given in part В of
the ISPS Code (paragraph B/4.39 of the ISPS Code). SOLAS regulation XI-2/5 is
one of the examples of practical security related information cited in
paragraph B/4.39 of the ISPS Code.
16.
SOLAS regulation XI-2/5 requires the Company to ensure that the master has
available on board, at all times, information through which officers duly
authorised by a Contracting Government can establish:
.1 who is
responsible for appointing the members of the crew or other persons currently
employed or engaged on board the ship in any capacity on the business of that
ship;
.2 who is
responsible for deciding the employment of the ship;
.3 in cases
where the ship is employed under the terms of charter party(ies), who are the
parties to such charter party(ies).
17.
SOLAS regulation XI-2/5 should always be read in association with the
provisions of paragraphs B/6.1 to B/6.8 of the ISPS Code.
Appendix.
STANDARD DATA SET OF SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
1.
Particulars of the ship and contact details
1.1. IMO Number(1)
(2)
1.2. Name of
ship(1) (2)
1.3. Port of
registry(1) (2)
1.4. Flag State(1)
(2)
1.5. Type of
ship(1)
1.6. Call Sign
1.7. Inmarsat
call numbers(3)
1.8. Gross
Tonnage(1)
1.9. Name of
Company(1) (2)
1.9.1. Company
Identification Number*
1.10. Name and
24-hour contact details of the Company Security Officer(4)
2.
Port and port facility information
2.1. Port of
arrival and port facility where the ship is to berth, if known
2.2. Expected
date and time of arrival of the ship in port (paragraph B/4.39.3 of the ISPS
Code)
2.3. Primary
purpose of call
3.
Information required by SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1
3.1. The ship is
provided (SOLAS regulation 9.2.1.1) with a valid:
— International
Ship Security Certificate
[] Yes [] No
— Interim
International Ship Security Certificate
[] Yes [] No
3.1.1. The
certificate indicated in 3.1 has been issued by <enter name of the
Contracting Government(1) (2) or the Recognized Security
Organization(1) (2)> and which expires on <enter dale of
expiry(1)>.
3.1.2. If the
ship is not provided with a valid International Ship Security Certificate or a
valid Interim International Ship Security Certificate, explain why?
3.1.2.1. Does
the ship have an approved ship security plan on board?
[] Yes [] No
3.2 Current
security level (SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1.2): []
3.2.1. Location
of the ship at the time the report is made (paragraph B/4.39.2 of the ISPS
Code)
3.3. List the
last ten calls, in chronological order with the most recent call first, at port
facilities at which the ship conducted ship/port interface*5* together with the
security level at which the ship operated (SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1.3):
No. |
From(6) |
To(6) |
Port, Country,
Port Facility and UNLOCODE(3) |
Security level |
3.3.1. Did the
ship, during the period specified 3.3, take any special or additional security
measures, beyond those specified in the approved ship security plan? []
Yes [] No
3.3.2. If the
answer to 3.3.1 is Yes, for each of such occasions please indicate the special
or additional security measures which were taken by the ship (SOLAS regulation
XI-2/9.2.1.4):
No. |
From(6) |
To(6) |
Port, Country,
Port Facility and UNLOCODE(3) |
Special or
additional security measures |
3.4. List the
ship-to-ship activities(7), in chronological order with the most
recent ship-to-ship activity first, which have been carried out during the
period specified in 3.3:
[] Not
applicable
No. |
From(6) |
To(6) |
Location or
Latitude and Longitude |
Ship-to-ship
activity |
3.4.1. Have the
ship security procedures specified in the approved ship security plan been
maintained during each of the ship-to-ship activities specified in 3.4 (SOLAS
regulation XI-2/9.2.1.5)? [] Yes [] No
3.4.2. If the
answer to 3.4.1 is No, identify the ship-to-ship activities for which the ship security
procedures were not maintained and indicate for each the security measures
which were applied in lieu:
No. |
From(6) |
To(6) |
Location or
Latitude and Longitude |
Ship-to-ship
activity |
3.5. Provide a
general description of cargo aboard the ship (SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.2.1.6 and
paragraph B/4.39.5 of the ISPS Code):
3.5.1. Is the
ship carrying any dangerous substances*8) as cargo?
[] Yes [] No
3.5.2. If the
answer to 3.5.1 is YES, provide details or attach a copy of the Dangerous Goods
Manifest (IMO FAL Form 7).
3.6. A copy of
the ship's Crew List (IMO FAL Form 5) is attached (SOLAS regulation XI-2/9.
2.1.6 and paragraph B/4. 39.4 of the ISPS Code) []
3.7. A copy of
the ship's Passenger List (IMO FAL Form 6) is attached (SOLAS regulation
XI-2/9.2.1.6 and paragraph B/4.39.6 of the ISPS Code) []