MSC.64(67) Adoption of New and Amended Performance Standards

 

Resolution MSC.64(67)

ADOPTION OF NEW AND AMENDED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.

(adopted on 4 December 1996)

 

 

THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE,

 

RECALLING Article 28(b) of the Convention on the International Maritime Organization concerning the functions of the Committee,

 

RECALLING ALSO resolution A.825(19), by which the Assembly resolved that the functions of adopting performance standards for radio and navigational equipment, as well as amendments thereto, shall be performed by the Maritime Safety Committee on behalf of the Organization,

 

HAVING CONSIDERED new performance standards and amendments to existing performance standards adopted by the Assembly prepared by the forty-second session of the Sub-Committee on Safety of Navigation,

 

1. ADOPTS the following new and recommended performance standards, set out in Annexes 1 to 2 to the present resolution:

 

(a) Recommendation on Performance Standards for Integrated Bridge Systems (IBS) (Annex 1);

 

(b) Recommendation on Performance Standards for Shipborne DGPS and DGLONASS Maritime Radio Beacon Receiver Equipment (Annex 2);

 

2. ALSO ADOPTS the amendments to the following performance standards adopted by the Assembly, set out in Annexes 3 to 5 to the present resolution:

 

(a) Resolution A.342(IX) - Recommendation on Performance Standards for Automatic Pilots (Annex 3);

 

(b) Resolution A.447(XII) - Recommendation on Performance Standards for Radar Equipment (Annex 4);

 

(c) Resolution A.817(19) - Recommendation on Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) (Annex 5);

 

3. RECOMMENDS Member Governments to ensure that:

 

(a) integrated bridge systems (IBS), shipborne DGPS and DGLONASS maritime radio beacon receiver equipment and electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS) installed on or after 1 January 1999 conform to performance standards not inferior to those set out in the Annexes 1, 2 and 5 to the present resolution;

 

(b) heading control systems and radar equipment installed on or after 1 January 1999 conform respectively to performance standards not inferior to those set out in Annexes 3 and 4 to the present resolution;

 

(c) automatic pilots and radar equipment installed before 1 January 1999 conform at least to the performance standards set out in resolutions A.342(IX) and A.477(XII), respectively.

 

Annex 1.

RECOMMENDATION ON PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR INTEGRATED BRIDGE SYSTEMS (IBS).

 

1. Introduction

 

1.1 An integrated bridge system (IBS) is defined as a combination of systems which are interconnected in order to allow centralized access to sensor information or command/control from workstations, with the aim of increasing safe and efficient ship's management by suitably qualified personnel.

 

1.2 IBS, in addition to meeting the functional requirements contained in applicable IMO instruments, the general requirements in resolution A.694(17)*, should comply with the following performance standards.

______________

 *IEC 945 Publication.

 

2. System requirement

 

The IBS should support systems performing two or more of the following operations:

 

.1 passage execution;

 

.2 communications;

 

.3 machinery control

 

.4 loading, discharging and cargo control; and

 

.5 safety and security.

 

3. General requirements

 

3.1 General

 

3.1.1 The IBS should comply with all applicable IMO requirements and recommendations. Parts executing multiple operations should meet the requirements specified for each individual function they control, monitor or perform.

 

3.1.2 Each  "part" of an IBS should meet the relevant requirements of resolution A.694(17) and their associated technical testing standards. In consequence, the IBS is in compliance with these requirements without further environmental testing.

 

Note: "part" is meant to be - for example - an individual module, equipment or subsystem.

 

3.1.3 A failure of one part should not affect the functionality of other parts except for those functions directly dependent upon the information from the defective part.

 

3.2 Integration

 

The IBS should provide functional integration meeting the following requirements:

 

.1 The functionality of the IBS should ensure that its operation is at least as effective as for stand-alone equipment.

 

.2 Continuously displayed information should be reduced to the minimum necessary for safe operation of the ship. Supplementary information should be readily accessible.

 

.3 Where multifunction displays and controls are used to perform functions necessary for safe operation of the ship they should be duplicated and interchangeable.

 

.4 It should be possible to display the complete system configuration, the available configuration and the configuration in use.

 

.5 Each part to be integrated should provide details of its operational status and the latency and validity of essential information. Means should be provided within the IBS to make use of this information.

 

.6 An alternative means of operation should be provided for essential functions.

 

.7 An alternative source of essential information should be provided. The IBS should identify loss of either source.

 

.8 The source of information (sensor, result of calculation or manual input) should be displayed continuously or upon request.

 

3.3 Data exchange

 

3.3.1 Interfacing to an IBS should comply with the relevant international marine interface standards.*

____________

 *IEC 1162 Publication.

 

3.3.2 Data exchange should be consistent with safe operation of the ship.

 

3.3.3 The integrity of data flowing on the network should be ensured.

 

3.3.4 A failure in the connectivity should not affect independent functionality.

 

3.4 Failure analysis

 

3.4.1 A failure analysis should be performed, documented and be acceptable.

 

4. Operational requirements

 

4.1 Human factors

 

4.1.1 The IBS should be capable of being operated by personnel holding appropriate certificates.

 

4.1.2 The Man Machine Interface (MMI) should be designed to be easily understood and in a consistent style for all integrated functions.

 

4.1.3 Where multifunction displays are used, they should be in colour, and continuously displayed information and functional areas, e.g. menus should be presented in a consistent manner.

 

4.1.4 F actions which may cause unintended results, the IBS should request confirmation from the operator.

 

4.2 Functionality

 

4.2.1 It should always be clear, from where essential functions may be performed .

 

4.2.2 The system management should ensure, that one user only has the focus of an input or function at the same time. If so, all other users should be informed about that by the IBS.

 

5. Technical requirements

 

5.1 Sensors

 

In order to ensure an adequate system functionality the sensors employed should ensure communication compatibility in accordance with the relevant international marine interface standard*; and provide information about their operational status and about the latency and validity of essential information.

_____________

 *IEC 1162 Publication.

 

5.2 Alarm management

 

5.2.1 The IBS alarm management, as a minimum, should comply with the requirements of the Code on Alarms and Indicators, 1995 (resolution A.830(19)).

 

5.2.2 Appropriate alarm management on priority and functional groups should be provided within the IBS.

 

5.2.3 The number of alarm types and their release should be kept as low as possible by providing indications for information of lower importance.

 

5.2.4 Alarms should be displayed so that the alarm reason and the resulting functional restrictions can be easily understood. Indications should be self-explanatory.

 

5.3 Power interruptions and shut-down

 

5.3.1 If subjected to an orderly shut-down, the IBS should, upon turn-on, come to an initial default state.

 

5.3.2 After a power interruption full functionality of the IBS should be available after recovery 000 of all subsystems. The IBS should not increase the recovery time of individual subsystem functions after power restoration.

 

5.3.3 If subjected to a power interruption the IBS should, upon restoration of power, maintain the configuration in use and continue automated operation, as far as practicable. Safety related automatic functions should only be restored upon confirmation by the operator.

 

5.4 Power supply

 

5.4.1 Power supply requirements applying to parts of the IBS as a result of other IMO requirements should remain applicable.

 

5.4.2 The IBS should be supplied:

 

.1 from the main and emergency sources of electrical power with automated changeover through a local distribution board with provision to preclude inadvertent shut-down;

 

.2 from a transitional source of electrical power for a duration of not less than 1 min; and

 

.3 where required, parts of the IBS should also be supplied from a reserve source of electrical power.

 

Annex 2.

RECOMMENDATION ON PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SHIPBORNE DGPS AND DGLONASS MARITIME RADIO BEACON RECEIVER EQUIPMENT

 

1. Introduction

 

1.1 Differential services broadcast information for augmenting the Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) to provide the accuracy and integrity required for entrances and harbour approaches and other waters in which the freedom to manoeuvre is limited. Various service providers are broadcasting differential information applicable to localized areas. Different services provide information for augmenting GPS, GLONASS, or both.

 

1.2 Receiver equipment for the reception and proper decoding of differential GPS and GLONASS maritime radio beacon broadcasts (fully compliant with ITU-R M.823) intended for navigational purposes on ships with maximum speeds not exceeding 50 kts shall, in addition to the general requirements contained in resolution A.694(17)*, comply with the following minimum performance requirements.

_____________

 *Refer to IEC 945 Publication.

 

1.3 This standard covers the basic requirements of maritime radio beacon receiver equipment providing augmentation information to position-fixing equipment. It does not cover other computational facilities which may be in the equipment.

 

2. DGPS and dglonass maritime radio beacon receiver equipment

 

The words "DGPS and DGLONASS maritime radio beacon receiver equipment" as used in this performance standard includes all the components and units necessary for the system to properly perform its intended functions. The equipment should include the following minimum facilities:

 

.1 antenna capable of receiving DGPS or DGLONASS maritime radio beacon signals;

 

.2 DGPS and DGLONASS maritime radio beacon receiver and processor;

 

.3 receiver control interface; and

 

.4 data output interface.

 

3. Functional requirements

 

The DGPS and DGLONASS maritime radio beacon receiver equipment should:

 

.1 operate in the band of 283.5 to 315 kHz in Region 1 and 285 to 325 kHz in Regions 2 and 3 in accordance with ITU-R M.823;

 

.2 provide means of automatically and manually selecting the frequency, but operator acknowledgement will be required for each frequency change when in automatic mode;

 

.3 make the data available for use with a delay not exceeding 100 ms after its reception;

 

.4 be capable of acquiring a signal in less than 45 seconds in the presence of electrical storms;

 

.5 have at least one serial data output that conforms to the relevant international marine interface standard*; and

 

.6 have an omni-directional antenna in the horizontal plane.

____________

 *Refer to IEC 1162 Publication.

 

4. Protection

 

Precautions should be taken to ensure that no permanent damage can result from an accidental short circuit or grounding of the antenna or any of its input or output connections or any of the DGPS and DGLONASS maritime radio beacon receiver equipment inputs or outputs for a duration of five minutes.

 

5. Alarms

 

The DGPS and DGLONASS maritime radio beacon receiver equipment should give an alarm if no DGPS or DGLONASS message is received.

 

Annex 3.

AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION A.342(IX) ON PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR AUTOMATIC PILOTS

 

Replace the Annex by:

 

"Annex.

RECOMMENDATION ON PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR HEADING CONTROL SYSTEMS*

_____________

 *Previously "Recommendation on Performance Standards for Autopilots".

 

1. Introduction

 

In addition to the general requirements contained in resolution A.694(17)**, heading control systems should comply with the following minimum performance requirements.

______________

**IEC 945 Publication.

 

2. Objectives

 

2.1 Within limits related to the ships's manoeuvrability the heading control system, in conjunction with its source of heading information, should enable a ship to keep a preset heading with minimum operation of the ship's steering gear.

 

2.2 A heading control system may work together with a track control system adjusting its heading for drift.

 

2.3 A turn rate control for performing turns may be provided.

 

3. Functional requirements

 

3.1 Adaption to steering characteristics and environmental conditions

 

The heading control system should be capable of adapting manually or automatically to different steering characteristics of the ship under various speed, weather and loading conditions, and provide reliable operation under prevailing environment and normal operational conditions.

 

3.2 Performing turns

 

The heading control system should be able to perform turns, within the turning capability of the ship, based either on a preset turning radius or a preset rate of turn.

 

3.3 Rudder angle limitation

 

Means should be incorporated in the equipment to enable rudder angle limitation in the automatic mode. Means should also be available to indicate when the angle of limitation has been commanded or reached. When other means of directional control are used the requirements of this section should appropriately apply.

 

3.4 Permitted yaw

 

Means should be incorporated to prevent unnecessary activation of the rudder due to normal yaw motion.

 

3.5 Preset heading

 

Any alteration of the preset heading should not be possible without intended action of the ship's personnel.

 

3.6 Limiting of overshoot

 

The heading control system should change to a preset heading without significant overshoot.

 

4. Change-over from automatic to manual steering and vice versa

 

4.1 Change-over from automatic to manual steering and vice-versa should be possible at any position of the rudder and should be effected by one manual control within 3 seconds.

 

4.2 Change-over from automatic to manual steering should be possible under any conditions including any failure in the automatic control system.

 

4.3 When changing over from manual to automatic steering the heading control system shall take over the actual heading as the preset heading.

 

4.4 There should be a single change-over control which should be located in such a position that it is easily accessible to the officer of the watch.

 

4.5 Adequate indication should be provided to show which method of steering is in operation.

 

5. Change-over from track control to heading control

 

5.1 If the heading control system works as part of a track control system, then when switching from track control to heading control, the actual heading should be taken as the preset heading.


Купить полный текст документа можно после авторизации

За дополнительной информацией обращайтесь в ООО "Планета Одесса"
Тел. +38 (048) 792-54-36, 050-336-5436 email: rise3info@gmail.com

Home