RESOLUTION MSC.289(87)
(adopted on 14 May 2010)
PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR ALTERNATIVE
MEANS OF CORROSION PROTECTION FOR CARGO OIL TANKS OF CRUDE OIL TANKERS
THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE,
RECALLING Article 28(b) of the Convention on the International Maritime
Organization concerning the functions of the Committee,
NOTING regulation II-1/3-11 of the International Convention for the
Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974, as amended (hereinafter referred to as
"the Convention") adopted by resolution MSC.291(87), concerning
alternative means of corrosion protection for cargo oil tanks of crude oil
tankers,
NOTING ALSO that the aforementioned regulation II-1/3-11 provides that
the alternative means of corrosion protection referred to therein shall comply
with the requirements of the Performance standard for alternative means of
corrosion protection for cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers (hereinafter
referred to as "the Performance standard for alternative means of
corrosion protection"),
HAVING CONSIDERED, at its eighty-seventh session, the text of the
proposed Performance standard for alternative means of corrosion protection,
1.
ADOPTS the Performance
standard for alternative means of corrosion protection for cargo oil tanks of
crude oil tankers, the text of which is set out in the Annex to the present
resolution;
2.
INVITES Contracting
Governments to the Convention to note that the Performance standard for
alternative means of corrosion protection will take effect on 1 January 2012
upon entry into force of SOLAS regulation II-1/3-11;
3.
NOTES that, under the
provisions of chapter II-1 of the SOLAS Convention, amendments to the
Performance standard for alternative means of corrosion protection shall be
adopted, brought into force and take effect in accordance with the provisions
of article VIII of that Convention concerning the amendment procedure
applicable to the annex to the Convention other than chapter I;
4.
REQUESTS the
Secretary-General to transmit certified copies of this resolution and the text
of the Performance standard for protective coatings contained in the Annex to
all Contracting Governments to the Convention;
5.
FURTHER REQUESTS the
Secretary-General to transmit copies of this resolution and the Annex to all
Members of the Organization which are not Contracting Governments to the
Convention;
6.
INVITES Governments to
encourage the development of novel technologies aimed at providing for
alternative systems and to keep the Organization advised of any positive
results;
7.
RESOLVES to keep the
Performance standard for alternative means of corrosion protection under review
and amend it as necessary, in light of experience gained in its application.
ANNEX
PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR ALTERNATIVE
MEANS OF CORROSION PROTECTION FOR CARGO OIL TANKS OF OIL TANKERS
1
PURPOSE
This Standard provides technical requirements for the minimum standard
for means of corrosion protection or utilization of corrosion resistant
material other than protective coating to be used for cargo oil tanks during
construction of crude oil tankers.
2
DEFINITION
2.1 Alternative means is a
means that is not a utilization of protective coating applied according to the
Performance standard for protective coating for cargo oil tanks of crude oil
tankers (resolution MSC.288(87)).
2.2 Corrosion resistant steel is
steel whose corrosion resistance performance in the bottom or top of the
internal cargo oil tank is tested and approved to satisfy the requirements in
this Standard in addition to other relevant requirements for ship material,
structure strength and construction.
2.3 Target useful life is the
target value, in years, of the durability for which the means of corrosion
protection or utilization of corrosion resistance material is designed.
3
APPLICATION
3.1 As of the date of the
development of this Standard, corrosion resistant "steel" is the only
recognized possible means for corrosion protection or utilization of corrosion
resistant material to maintain the required structural integrity for 25 years,
as an alternative to protective coating. If corrosion resistant steel is to be
used as alternative means, it shall comply with the Performance Standard for
corrosion resistant steel as set out in the annex.
3.2 When a novel type of alternative
means to which the provisions in the annex are not applicable has been
developed, and recognized by the Organization, a specific performance standard
including testing procedure(s) should be developed by the Organization by
adding a new annex to this Standard, taking into account experience gained
through field tests for the novel prototype alternative conducted in accordance
with SOLAS regulation II-1/3-11.4.
ANNEX
PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR CORROSION
RESISTANT STEEL
1
PURPOSE
This Standard provides technical requirements for the minimum standard
for corrosion resistant steel to be used for cargo oil tanks during
construction of crude oil tankers.
2
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
2.1 The ability of corrosion
resistant steel to reach its target useful life depends on the type of steel,
application and survey. All these aspects contribute to the good performance of
corrosion resistant steel.
2.2
Technical File
2.2.1 Documents and information stipulated in 2.2.3
and 2.2.4 shall be documented in the Technical File. The Technical File shall
be verified by the Administration.
2.2.2 The Technical File shall be kept on board and
maintained throughout the life of the ship.
2.2.3 New construction stage
The Technical File shall contain at least the following items relating
to this Standard and shall be delivered by the shipyard at new ship
construction stage:
.1
copy of a Type Approval Certificate;
.2
technical data, including:
.2.1
approved welding methods and welding consumables; and
.2.2
repairing methods recommended by the manufacturer (if any); and
.3
records of the application, including:
.3.1
applied actual space and area of each compartment; and
.3.2
applied product and its thickness.
2.2.4 In-service maintenance, repair and partial
renewal
In-service maintenance, repair and renewal activities shall be recorded
in the Technical File.
3
CORROSION RESISTANT STEEL STANDARD
3.1
Performance standard
This Standard is based on specifications and requirements which intend
to provide a target useful life of 25 years, which is considered to be the time
period, from initial application, over which the thickness diminution of the
steel is intended to be less than the diminution allowance and watertight
integrity is intended to be maintained in cargo oil tanks. The actual useful
life will vary, depending on numerous variables including actual conditions
encountered in service.
3.2
Standard application
Corrosion resistant steel for cargo oil tanks applied to the area
specified in 3.4 during the construction of crude oil tankers shall at least
comply with the requirements in this Standard and this should be considered as
a minimum.
3.3 Special
application
3.3.1 This Standard covers corrosion resistant steel
requirements for ship's steel structures. It is noted that other independent
items are fitted within the tanks to which measures are applied to provide
protection against corrosion.
3.3.2 It is recommended that this Standard or the
Performance standard for protective coating for cargo oil tanks is applied, to
the extent possible, to those portions of permanent means of access provided
for inspection within the area specified in 3.4 that are not integral to the
ship's structure, such as rails, independent platforms, ladders, etc. Other
equivalent methods of providing corrosion protection for the non-integral items
may also be used, provided they do not impair the performance of the corrosion
resistant steel of the surrounding structure. Access arrangements that are
integral to the ship structure, such as increased stiffener depths for
walkways, stringers, etc., are to fully comply with this Standard or the
Performance standard for protective coating for cargo oil tanks, when located
within the areas specified in 3.4.
3.3.3 It is also recommended that supports for piping,
measuring devices, etc., be provided with corrosion protection in accordance
with the non-integral items indicated in 3.3.2.
3.4 Area of
application
The following areas are the minimum areas that shall be protected
according to this Standard:
.1
Deckhead with complete internal structure, including brackets connecting to
longitudinal and transverse bulkheads. In tanks with ring frame girder
construction the underdeck transverse framing to be protected down to level of
the first tripping bracket below the upper faceplate.
.2
Longitudinal and transverse bulkheads to be protected to the uppermost means of
access level. The uppermost means of access and its supporting brackets to be
fully protected.
.3
On cargo tank bulkheads without an uppermost means of access the protection to
extend to 10% of the tanks height at centreline but need not extend more than 3
m down from the deck.
.4
Flat inner bottom and all structure to height of 0.3 m above inner bottom to be
protected.

3.5 Basic
requirements
The requirements for corrosion resistant steel to be applied at ship
construction for cargo tanks in crude oil tankers meeting the performance
standard specified in 3.1 are to use approved corrosion resistant steels
according to the conditions specified in the Type Approval Certificate and the
Technical File to protect the area of application indicated in 3.4.
4
APPROVAL
4.1 Corrosion resistant steel shall
be tested according to the appendix, or equivalent, for approval. Corrosion
resistant steel tested prior to entry into force of this Standard may be
accepted, provided that the steel is tested according to the test procedure in
the appendix, or equivalent.
4.2 Results from prequalification
tests (4.1) of corrosion resistant steel shall be documented, and a Type
Approval Certificate shall be issued if found satisfactory by the
Administration.
4.3 The Type Approval Certificate
shall include following information:
.1
product name and
identification mark and/or number;
.2
materials, components
and corrosion resistance process of the steel;
.3
steel thickness;
.4
welding methods and welding consumables; and
.5
applicable area (upper
and/or inner bottom plate).
5
INSPECTION AND VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
To ensure compliance with this Standard, the Administration shall carry
out survey(s) during the construction process and verify that approved
corrosion resistant steel has been applied to the area required.
APPENDIX
TEST PROCEDURES FOR QUALIFICATION OF
CORROSION RESISTANT STEEL FOR CARGO TANKS IN CRUDE OIL TANKERS
1
Scope
These Procedures provide details of the test procedure referred to in
4.1 of this Standard.
2
Testing
Corrosion resistant steel shall be verified by the following tests.
2.1 Test
on simulated upper deck conditions
2.1.1 Test condition
Tests on simulated upper deck conditions in cargo oil tank (COT) shall
satisfy each of the following conditions:
.1
Corrosion resistant steel and conventional steel shall be tested at the same
time.
.2
The chemical composition of conventional steel shall comply with the
requirements of table 1. The mechanical properties of the test specimen should
be representative of steel used in its intended shipboard application.
Table 1 - Chemical composition for conventional
steel (%)
|
C |
Mn |
Si |
P |
S |
|
0.13-0.17 |
1.00-1.20 |
0.15-0.35 |
0.010-0.020 |
0.002-0.008 |
|
Al(acid soluble min) |
Nb max. |
V max |
Ti max |
Nb+V+Ti max. |
|
0.015 |
0.02 |
0.10 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
|
Cu max. |
Cr max. |
Ni max. |
Mo max. |
Others max. |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.02 |
0.02 (each) |
.3
The tests for corrosion
resistant steel shall be carried out for 21, 49, 77 and 98 days. The tests for
conventional steel shall be carried out for 98 days. The tests for welded
joints shall be carried out for 98 days.
.4
There are to be five test pieces for each test period.
.5
The size of each test piece is 25 1 mm x 60 1 mm x 5 0.5 mm. The surface of
the test piece shall be polished with an emery paper #600. The size of the test
piece for a welded joint is 25 1 mm x 60 1 mm x 5 0.5 mm, including 15 5 mm
width of the weld metal part.
.6
The surface of the test piece, except for the tested surface, shall be
protected from corrosive environment in order not to affect the test results.
.7
The test apparatus consists of a double chamber, and the temperature of the
outer chamber is to be controlled.
.8
Simulating the condition of the actual upper deck, the test cycle runs with
distilled water and simulated COT gas (4 1% O2 - 13 2% CO2
- 100 10 ppm SO2 - 500 50 ppm H2S - 83 2% N2).
A sufficient distance between the surface of the test piece and the distilled
water is to be kept to avoid splashing of distilled water. The minimum gas flow
rate is 100 cc per minute for the first 24 h and 20 cc per minute after 24 h.
.9
The test pieces shall be heated for 19 2 h at 50 2C and 3 2 h at 25 2C
and the transition time is to be at least 1 h. The time for 1 cycle is 24 h.
The temperature of the distilled water is to be kept at not higher than 36C, while
the temperature of the test pieces is 50C.

2.1.2 Test results of base metal
Prior to the testing, the following measured data shall be reported:
.1
size and weight of the test piece; and, after the testing, the following
measured data shall be reported:
.2
weight loss (difference between initial weight and weight after testing) of
conventional steel (WC) and corrosion resistant steel (W21,
W49, W77 and W98);
.3
corrosion loss of conventional steel (CLC) and corrosion resistant
steel (CL21, CL49, CL77 and CL98),
calculated by the following formulae:

whereby:
WC:
weight loss of conventional steel (g) (average of five test pieces)
W21:
weight loss of corrosion resistant steel after 21 days (g) (average of five
test pieces)
W49:
weight loss of corrosion resistant steel after 49 days (g) (average of five
test pieces)
W77:
weight loss of corrosion resistant steel after 77 days (g) (average of five
test pieces)
W98:
weight loss of corrosion resistant steel after 98 days (g) (average of five
test pieces)
S: surface area
(cm2)
D: density (g/cm3).
The test is
considered to be carried out appropriately if CLC is between 0.05
and 0.11 (corrosion rate is between 0.2 and 0.4 mm/year). The concentration of
H2S in simulated COT gas may be increased for adjusting CLC;
.4
coefficients A and B of corrosion resistant steel, calculated from the test
results for 21, 49, 77 and 98 days by least square method.
Corrosion loss of
corrosion resistant steel is described as follows:

A(mm) and B:
coefficient t: test period(days);
.5
estimated corrosion loss after 25 years (ECL) calculated by the following
formula:

2.1.3 Test results of welded joint
The surface boundary between base metal and weld metal shall be observed
by microscope at 1,000 times magnification.
2.1.4 Acceptance criteria
The test results based on provisions of 2.1.2 and 2.1.3 shall satisfy
the following criteria:
.1

.2
no discontinuous surface (e.g., step) between the base metal and weld metal
(for welded joint).
2.1.5 Test report
The test report shall include the following information:
.1 name of the manufacturer;
.2
date of tests;
.3
chemical composition and corrosion resistant process of steel;
.4
test results according to 2.1.2 and 2.1.3;
and
.5 j udgement according to 2.1.4.
2.2 Test
on simulated inner bottom conditions
2.2.1 Test condition
Tests on simulated inner bottom conditions in cargo oil tanks (COT)
should satisfy each of the following conditions:
.1
The test shall be carried out for 72 h for base metal, and 168 h for welded
joint.
.2
There are to be at least five test pieces of corrosion resistant steel for base
metal and welded joint, respectively. For comparison, at least five test pieces
of base metal of conventional steel should be tested in the same condition.
.3
The size of each test piece is 25 1 mm x 60 1 mm x 5 0.5 mm for a specimen
with base metal only, and is 25 1 mm x 60 1 mm x 5 0.5 mm for a specimen
with welded joint including 15 5 mm width of weld metal part as shown in
figure 3. The surface of the test pieces shall be polished with an emery paper
#600, except a hole for hanging.
.4
The samples are hung in a solution from a fishing line (0.3 mm to 0.4 mm in
diameter, made of nylon) to avoid crevice-like and/or localized corrosion. An
example of a corrosion test configuration is shown in figure 4.
.5 The test solution contains 10 mass% NaCl and its pH is 0.85 adjusted by HCl solution. The test solution should be changed to a new one every 24 h to minimize pH change of the test solution.