Resolution MSC.252(83)
ADOPTION OF THE REVISED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR INTEGRATED NAVIGATION SYSTEMS
(INS)
(adopted
on 8 October 2007)
THE
MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE,
RECALLING
Article 28(b) of the Convention on the International Maritime Organization
concerning the functions of the Committee,
RECALLING
ALSO resolution A.886(21), by which the Assembly resolved that the function of
adopting performance standards and technical specifications, as well as
amendments thereto shall be performed by the Maritime Safety Committee and/or
the Marine Environment Protection Committee, as appropriate, on behalf of the
Organization,
RECALLING
FURTHER regulation V/15 of the International Convention for the Safety of Life
at Sea (SOLAS), 1974, concerning principles relating to bridge design, design
and arrangement of navigational systems and equipment and bridge procedures,
NOTING
that SOLAS regulation V/18 requires type approved navigational systems
conforming to appropriate performance standards,
RECOGNIZING
the need to revise the performance standards for Integrated Navigation Systems
(INS) to enhance the safety of navigation by providing integrated and augmented
functions to avoid geographic, traffic and environmental hazards,
HAVING
CONSIDERED the recommendation on the revised performance standards for
Integrated Navigation Systems made by the Sub-Committee on Safety of Navigation
at its fifty-third session, and the Maritime Safety Committee at its
eighty-third session,
1.
ADOPTS the Revised Recommendation on performance standards for Integrated
Navigation Systems (INS), set out in the Annex to the present resolution;
2.
RECOMMENDS Governments ensure that Integrated Navigation Systems (INS):
(a) if installed on or after
1 January 2011, conform to performance standards not inferior to those
specified in the Annex to the present resolution; and
(b) if installed on or after
1 January 2000 but before 1 January 2011, conform to performance standards not
inferior to those specified in the Annex 3 to resolution MSC.86(70).
Annex.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR INTEGRATED NAVIGATION SYSTEMS (INS)
1. Purpose of integrated navigation
systems
1.1
The purpose of integrated navigation systems (INS) is to enhance the safety of
navigation by providing integrated and augmented functions to avoid geographic,
traffic and environmental hazards.
1.2
By combining and integrating functions and information the INS provides
"added value" for the operator to plan, monitor and/or control safety
of navigation and progress of the ship.
1.3
Integrity monitoring is an intrinsic function of the INS. The INS supports
safety of navigation by evaluating inputs from several sources, combining them
to provide information giving timely alerts of dangerous situations and system
failures and degradation of integrity of this information.
1.4
The INS presents correct, timely, and unambiguous information to the users and
provides subsystems and subsequent functions within the INS and other connected
equipment with this information.
1.5
The INS supports mode and situation awareness.
1.6
The INS aims to ensure that, by taking human factors into consideration; the
workload is kept within the capacity of the operator in order to enhance safe
and expeditious navigation and to complement the mariner's capabilities, while
at the same time to compensate for their limitations.
1.7
The INS aims to be demonstrably suitable for the user and the given task in a
particular context of use.
1.8
The purpose of the alert management is specified in module C.
2.1.1
An INS comprises navigational tasks such as "Route planning",
"Route monitoring", "Collision avoidance", "Navigation
control data", "Navigation status and data display" and
"Alert management", including the respective sources, data and
displays which are integrated into one navigation system. These tasks are
described in paragraph 7.
2.1.2
An INS is defined as such if work stations provide multifunctional displays
integrating at least the following navigational tasks/functions:
- "Route
monitoring"
-
"Collision avoidance"
and
may provide manual and/or automatic navigation control functions.
2.1.3
Other mandatory tasks
2.1.3.1
An alert management is a part of the INS. The scope and the requirements of the
alert management are specified in module C.
2.1.3.2
The presentation of navigation control data for manual control as specified in
paragraph 7.5.2 of these performance standards is part of the INS.
2.1.4
Other navigational tasks/functions may also be integrated in the INS.
2.2.1
The tasks are allocated to, and operated by the operator on, a defined set of
multi-functional "task stations".
2.2.2
The scope of an INS may differ dependent on the number and kind of tasks
integrated.
2.2.3
Configuration, use, operation and display of the INS is situation-dependent on:
- shift
underway, at anchor, and moored,
- manual and
automatic navigation control in different waters,
- planned
routine navigation and special manoeuvres.
3. Application of these performance
standards
3.1 Purpose of these standards
3.1.1
The purpose of these performance standards is to support the proper and safe
integration of navigational functions and information.
3.1.2
The purpose is in particular:
- to allow the
installation and use of an INS instead of stand-alone navigational equipment
onboard ships; and
- to promote
safe procedures for the integration process;
both
for
- comprehensive
integration; and
- partial
integration,
of
navigational functions, data and equipment.
3.1.3
These standards supplement for INS functional requirements of the individual
Performance Standards adopted by the Organization.
3.2.1
These performance standards are applicable to systems where functions/equipment
of at least the navigational tasks mentioned in paragraph 2.1.2 are combined.
3.2.2
If further tasks are integrated, the requirements of these standards should
apply to all additional functions implemented in the INS.
3.3 Modules of these standards
3.3.1
These performance standards are based on a modular concept which should provide
for individual configurations and for extensions, if required.
3.3.2
These standards contain four modules:
- Module A for
the requirements for the integration of navigational information,
- Module B for
the operational/functional requirements for INS based on a task-related
structure,
- Module C for
the requirements of the Alert management, and
- Module D for
the Documentation requirements.
3.4 Application of modules These performance
standards are applicable to all INS as follows:
3.4.1
Modules A, C, D and paragraphs 6, 8 to 13 of module B are applicable for any
INS.
3.4.2
Additionally, for each task integrated into the INS, the INS should fulfil
both:
- the
requirements of the respective tasks as specified in paragraph 7 of module B
and
- the relevant
modules of performance standards for stand-alone equipment as specified in
Table 1.
Table
1
INS Tasks and functions (Para of
thisstandard) |
Additionally
applicable modules of specific equipment standards for task integrated into
the INS. The modules are specified in the appendices of these performance
standards, if not specified in the equipment standards. |
Collision avoidance (7.4) |
Radar PS (Res. MSC.192(79)) (Modules
specified in Appendix 3) Module A: "Sensor and Detection" Module B: "Operational
requirements" Module C:" Design and Technical
requirements" |
Route planning (7.2) Route monitoring (7.3) |
ECDIS PS (Res. MSC.232(82)) Module A: "Database" Module B: "Operational and functional
requirements" |
Track control (7.5.3 and 8.6, 8.7) |
Track Control PS Res. MSC.74(69), Annex 2
(Modules specified in Appendix 4) Module B: "Operational and functional
requirements" |
3.5 Acceptance of INS as navigational
equipment
3.5.1
These standards may allow for accepting INS to substitute for some carriage
requirements of navigational equipment as equivalent to other means under SOLAS
regulation V/19. In this case, the INS should comply with:
- these
performance standards; and
- for the relevant
tasks of these performance standards, with the applicable modules of the
equipment performance standards as specified in Table 2.
Table
2
Allow
for accepting the INS as |
INS
in compliance with |
|||
Tasks
and functions (Para of this standard) |
Applicable
modules of specific equipment standards as specified in the Appendices of the
document |
|
||
Radar system |
Collision avoidance (7.4) |
Radar PS (Res.
MSC.192(79)) (Modules specified in Appendix 3) Module A: "Sensor and
Detection" Module B:
"Operational requirements" Module C:" Design and
Technical requirements" |
|
|
ECDIS |
Route planning (7.2) Route monitoring (7.3) |
ECDIS PS (Res.
MSC.232(82)) Module A:
"Database" Module B:
"Operational and functional requirements" |
|
|
Heading control system
(HCS) |
Navigation control data
(7.5) or Navigation status and data display (7.7) |
Res. A.342, as amended –
MSC.64(67), Annex 3 |
|
|
Track control system,
(TCS) |
Navigation control data
and track control (7.5.3 and 8.6, 8.7) |
Track Control Res.
MSC.74(69), Annex 2 (Modules specified in Appendix 4) Module B:
"Operational and functional requirements" |
|
|
Presentation of AIS data |
Collision avoidance (7.4)
Navigation control data (7.5) |
MSC.74 (69), Annex 3 |
|
|
Echo sounding system |
Route monitoring (7.3) |
MSC.74(69), Annex 4 |
|
|
EPFS |
Navigation control data
(7.5) or Navigation status and data display (7.7) |
GPS Res. A.819(19), as
amended, MSC.112(73) or GALILEO, Res.
MSC.233(82) or GLONAS, Res.
MSC.53(66), as amended MSC.113(73) |
|
|
SDME |
Navigation control data
(7.5) or Navigation status and data display (7.7) |
Res. MSC.96(72) |
|
|
3.6 The application of the alert management
is specified in module C.
3.7.1
The workstation design, layout and arrangement is not addressed in this
performance standards, but in MSC/Circ.982.
For
the purpose of these standards the definitions in Appendix 1 apply.
Module A – Integration of
Information
5. Requirements for integration of
navigational information
5.1
Interfacing and data exchange
5.1.1
An INS should combine, process and evaluate data from connected sensors and
sources.
5.1.2
The availability, validity and integrity of data exchange within the INS and
from connected sensors and sources should be monitored.
5.1.3
A failure of data exchange should not affect any independent functionality.
5.1.4
Interfacing to, from, and within the INS should comply with international
standards for data exchange and interfacing as appropriate.
5.1.5
The interface(s) should comply with the interface requirements of the alert
management as described in Module C of these performance standards.
5.2
Accuracy
5.2.1
INS data should comply with the accuracy and resolution required by applicable
performance standards of the Organization.
5.3
Validity, plausibility, latency
5.3.1
Validity
5.3.1.1
Data failing validity checks should not be used by the INS for functions
dependent on these data, unless for cases where the relevant performance
standards specifically allow use of invalid data. There should be no side
effects for functions not depending on this data.
5.3.1.2
When data used by the INS for a function becomes invalid, or unavailable, a
warning should be given. When data not actually in use by the INS becomes
invalid, or unavailable, a this should be indicated at least as a caution.
5.3.2
Plausibility
5.3.2.1
Received or derived data that is used or distributed by the INS should be
checked for plausible magnitudes of values.
5.3.2.2
Data which has failed the plausibility checks should not be used by the INS and
should not affect functions not dependent on these data.
5.3.3
Latency
5.3.3.1
Data latency (timeliness and repetition rate of data) within the INS should not
degrade the functionality specified in the relevant performance standards.
5.4
Consistent common reference system (CCRS)
5.4.1
Consistency of data
5.4.1.1
The INS should ensure that the different types of information are distributed
to the relevant parts of the system, applying a "consistent common
reference system" for all types of information.
5.4.1.2
Details of the source and the method of processing of such data should be
provided for further use within INS.
5.4.1.3
The CCRS should ensure that all parts of the INS are provided with the same
type of data from the same source.
5.4.2
Consistent common reference point
5.4.2.1
The INS should use a single consistent common reference point for all spatially
related information. For consistency of measured ranges and bearings, the
recommended reference location should be the conning position. Alternative
reference locations may be used where clearly indicated or distinctively
obvious. The selection of an alternative reference point should not affect the
integrity monitoring process.
5.4.3
Consistency of thresholds
5.4.3.1
The INS should support the consistency of thresholds for monitoring and alert
functions.
5.4.3.2
The INS should ensure by automatic means that consistent thresholds are used by
different parts of an INS, where practicable.
5.4.3.3
A caution may be given when thresholds entered by the bridge team differ from
thresholds set in other parts of the INS.
5.5
Integrity monitoring
5.5.1
The integrity of data should be monitored and verified automatically before
being used, or displayed.
5.5.2
The integrity of information should be verified by comparison of the data
derived independently from at least two sensors and/or sources, if available.
5.5.3
The INS should provide manual or automatic means to select the most accurate
method of integrity monitoring from the available sensors and/or sources.
5.5.4
A clear indication of the sensors and sources of data selected for integrity
monitoring should be provided.
5.5.5
The INS should provide a warning, if integrity verification is not possible or
failed.
5.5.6
Data which fails the integrity monitoring function or data where integrity
monitoring is not possible should not be used for automatic control
systems/functions.
5.6
Marking of data
5.6.1
The data should be marked with the source and the results of validity,
plausibility checks and integrity monitoring to enable subsequent functions to
decide whether their input data complies with their requirements or not.
5.7
Selection of sensors and sources
5.7.1
INS should provide two user selectable sensor/source selection modes when
multiple sensors/sources are available; manual sensor/source selection mode and
automatic sensor/source selection mode.
5.7.2
In manual sensor/source selection mode it should be possible to select
individual sensors/ sources for use in the INS. In case a more suitable
sensor/source is available this should be indicated.
5.7.3
In automatic sensor/source selection mode, the most suitable sensors/sources
available should be automatically selected for use in the INS. It should
further be possible to manually exclude individual sensors/sources from being
automatically selected.
Module B – Task related
requirements for Integrated Navigation Systems
6.1
The design of the INS should ease the workload of the bridge team and pilot in
safely and effectively carrying out the navigation functions incorporated
therein.
6.2
The integration should provide all functions, depending of the task for which
the INS is used and configured, to facilitate the tasks to be performed by the
bridge team and pilot in safely navigating the ship.
6.3
Each part of the INS should comply with all applicable requirements adopted by
the Organization, including the requirements of these performance standards.
6.4
When functions of equipment connected to the INS provide facilities in addition
to these performance standards, the operation and, as far as is reasonably
practicable, the malfunction of such additional facilities should not degrade
the performance of the INS below the requirements of these standards.
6.5
The integration of functions of individual equipment into the INS should not
degrade the performance below the requirements specified for the individual
equipment by the Organization.
6.6
Alerts should be generated and presented according to Module C.